Facts
The applicants were arrested on 07.01.2026 in connection with Crime No. 05/2026 at Police Station Patewa
Source reference: para 1, 2The prosecution alleged that, acting on secret information, the police seized 69.120 bulk litres of illicit country-made liquor from the applicants' possession
Source reference: para 2The applicants moved the High Court for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), contending false implication, political vendetta, and a lack of criminal antecedents
Source reference: para 1, 3The State opposed the bail, noting that the charge-sheet had already been filed
Source reference: para 4Issues
1. Whether the applicants are entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS considering the nature of the offence and the period of incarceration
Source reference: para 6Law Applied
The court applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the grant of regular bail
Source reference: para 1It further considered Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, which prescribes penalties for the possession of illicit liquor
Source reference: para 1Procedural compliance and conditions for liberty were grounded in Sections 84, 209, 269, and 351 of the BNSS and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
Source reference: para 7Reasoning
The Court weighed the gravity of the allegations against the fact that the applicants had no prior criminal record
Source reference: para 6Significant weight was given to the procedural status of the case, specifically that the investigation was complete and the charge-sheet had already been filed before the competent court
Source reference: para 6The Court observed that the applicants had been in judicial custody since January 2026 and that the trial would likely consume a considerable amount of time
Source reference: para 6Recognizing that the purpose of bail is to ensure the presence of the accused at trial rather than to serve as pre-trial punishment, the Court determined that the applicants were unlikely to abscond or tamper with witnesses if released under stringent conditions
Source reference: para 3, 6Holding
The Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of Nityanand Saand and Miniketan Nag
The holding was contingent upon the applicants furnishing a personal bond with two local sureties each. The Court imposed several conditions: the applicants must not seek adjournments during evidence, must remain present on all trial dates (subject to Section 269 of the BNS for absence), and must appear specifically for the opening of the case, framing of charges, and recording of statements under Section 351 of the BNSS. Any abuse of liberty would allow the trial court to initiate proceedings under Section 209 of the BNS or revoke bail
Source reference: para 7Original Court PDF
NITYANAND SAANDvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in