Facts
The applicant was arrested on January 4, 2026, following a police raid where 30 liters of Mahua liquor were allegedly seized from his possession
Source reference: para 2A case was registered under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act at Police Station Civil Line, Rampur.
Source reference: para 3The applicant has been in custody since the date of his arrest, and the charge-sheet has already been filed
Source reference: para 3It was noted that the applicant has one prior criminal antecedent under Section 20(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, which is currently pending
Source reference: para 3, 4Issues
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, given the filing of the charge-sheet and the nature of his criminal history
Source reference: para 1, 6Law Applied
Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), which provides the High Court with the power to grant regular bail
Source reference: para 1Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, which carries a sentencing range of one to three years
Source reference: para 3Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) regarding non-appearance
Source reference: para 7(ii)Section 84 of the BNSS regarding proclamations for absconding persons
Source reference: para 7(iii)Reasoning
Although the State opposed bail due to the applicant’s prior NDPS antecedent [para 4], the Court noted that the charge-sheet in the present case had already been filed
Source reference: para 6The Court reasoned that since the maximum punishment for the offense is three years and the applicant had been in jail since early January 2026, further detention was unnecessary as the trial was likely to be protracted
Source reference: para 3, 6The Court determined that the applicant's liberty could be protected while ensuring the integrity of the trial through the imposition of strict conditions, including an undertaking against seeking adjournments and mandatory personal appearances at key trial stages
Source reference: para 7Holding
The Court allowed the application and granted regular bail to the applicant upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties
The Court held that the conclusion of the trial would take time and that the applicant's continued detention was not warranted under the circumstances
Source reference: para 6The grant of bail was made subject to several conditions: the applicant must not seek adjournments when witnesses are present [para 7(i)], must appear on all fixed dates [para 7(ii)], and must be present for the framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 of the BNSS
Source reference: para 7(iv)Original Court PDF
GOPI SINGH PAWLEvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in