Facts
The applicant was arrested on January 29, 2026, after being intercepted by police near Mirchinala Water Tank, Ujjain.
Source reference: para 1, 7Upon search, five bulk liters of country-made raw liquor were recovered from his possession.
Source reference: para 7The police suspected the liquor was unfit for human consumption, leading to a charge under Section 49-A of the M.P. Excise Act.
Source reference: para 1, 7While the investigation is complete and the final report has been filed, the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report is still awaited.
Source reference: para 4The applicant, a 24-year-old labourer, has three criminal antecedents, including one prior minor conviction resulting in a "Till Rising of the Court" (TRC) sentence and a fine.
Source reference: para 5, 6Issues
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pending the determination of the liquor's toxicity.
Source reference: para 1, 9Law Applied
The Court primarily applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which provides the High Court with special powers regarding bail.
Source reference: para 1It further considered Section 49-A of the M.P. Excise Act, which prescribes penalties for the possession of liquor unfit for human consumption.
Source reference: para 1The court also relied on general principles of bail jurisprudence, emphasizing that incarceration should not be continued unnecessarily when investigation is complete, the risk of tampering with evidence is low due to the applicant's socio-economic status, and the offense is triable by a Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC).
Source reference: para 8Reasoning
The Court observed that the prosecution has yet to prove the liquor was unfit for human consumption, as the chemical analysis remains pending.
Source reference: para 7It noted that the applicant is a labourer with family responsibilities, suggesting a low flight risk and a lack of capacity to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence.
Source reference: para 4, 8Although the State opposed bail citing criminal antecedents, the Court found that the applicant had no history of major convictions or "substantial criminal past".
Source reference: para 6, 8Given that the investigation is finished and the final report filed, the Court reasoned that the veracity of the allegations is a matter for trial and does not warrant continued pre-trial detention.
Source reference: para 4, 7, 8Holding
The Court allowed the application and granted regular bail.
The applicant was ordered to be released upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of the same amount.
Source reference: para 10The Court imposed standard conditions of conduct and a specific self-canceling condition: if the forthcoming FSL report reveals any poisonous substance in the seized liquor, the bail order shall stand cancelled automatically without further reference to the Court.
Source reference: para 10(6), 11Original Court PDF
SajidvsThe State Of Madhya Pradesh
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in