Facts
The applicant filed a first bail application after being arrested in connection with Crime No. 85/2026 at Police Station Mahasamund for an offense under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959.
Source reference: para. 1The prosecution alleged that during a police raid at Sanjay Kanan Garden, the applicant was found waving a knife and creating a public nuisance.
Source reference: para. 2The applicant contended he was falsely implicated, was not present at the spot, and had been in custody since February 20, 2026.
Source reference: para. 3While the applicant admitted to one previous criminal antecedent, he noted that the charge-sheet in the present matter had already been filed.
Source reference: para. 3The State opposed bail, emphasizing the applicant's criminal history.
Source reference: para. 4Issues
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, given the filing of the charge-sheet and the nature of the alleged offense.
Source reference: para. 1, 6Law Applied
The Court primarily applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the grant of regular bail.
Source reference: para. 1The substantive charge involved Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959.
Source reference: para. 1Additionally, the Court referenced procedural safeguards and penalties for bail default under Sections 84, 269, and 351 of the BNSS and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The Court evaluated the gravity of the allegations alongside the progress of the legal proceedings. It observed that the investigation had reached a stage where the charge-sheet was already filed.
Source reference: para. 6Although the applicant had a prior criminal record, the Court weighed this against the fact that he had been incarcerated for approximately six weeks (since February 20, 2026) and the trial was expected to be protracted.
Source reference: para. 6The Court reasoned that under the prevailing facts and circumstances—specifically the completion of the investigation and the likely duration of the trial—the applicant’s further detention was unnecessary, provided strict conditions were imposed to ensure his presence during the trial.
Source reference: para. 6-7Holding
The Court allowed the bail application and ordered the applicant's release on a personal bond with two sureties.
The holding is subject to several conditions: (i) the applicant must not seek adjournments during witness testimony; (ii) he must appear on every date fixed by the trial court; (iii) default in appearance may trigger proceedings under Section 269 of the BNS or Section 84 of the BNSS; and (iv) he must be personally present for the opening of the case, framing of charges, and recording of his statement under Section 351 of the BNSS.
Source reference: para. 7Original Court PDF
PURAN ALIAS MONU SAHUvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in