Chhattisgarh High Court

Charge-sheet filing and prolonged incarceration warrant bail in excise offences notwithstanding the accused's criminal antecedents.

JAGESH @ JAGGU CHOUHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 24, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant was arrested following a police patrol based on informant information regarding the illegal possession of liquor for sale

Source reference: para. 2

The police seized 5.760 bulk litres of country-made liquor from an open place; the applicant failed to produce valid documentation for the same

Source reference: para. 2

Consequently, Crime No. 514/2025 was registered under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act

Source reference: para. 1

The applicant has been in custody since December 25, 2025

Source reference: para. 3

This is the first bail application moved under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023

Source reference: para. 1
02

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, considering his criminal antecedents and the nature of the seized material

Source reference: para. 1, 6
03

Law Applied

The court primarily applied Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the High Court's power to grant bail

Source reference: para. 1

The substantive charge was under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, which prescribes a minimum sentence of one year and a maximum of three years

Source reference: para. 3

The court further referenced procedural and penal consequences for bail default under Sections 209 and 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 351 of the BNSS regarding the recording of statements

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The court examined the applicant's plea that the liquor was not in his exclusive possession and that the charge-sheet had already been filed

Source reference: para. 3, 4

While the State opposed bail citing four pending criminal antecedents under the BNS, the court noted that the applicant had provided an explanation for these in the application

Source reference: para. 3, 6

The court balanced the gravity of the allegations against the fact that the maximum punishment for the offense is three years and that the applicant had already been incarcerated for approximately three months

Source reference: para. 3, 6

Given that the trial's conclusion would take a considerable amount of time and the investigation (charge-sheet) was complete, the court found the applicant eligible for release

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The court allowed the bail application and ordered the applicant’s release on a personal bond with two sureties

The holding clarified that the duration of custody and the filing of the charge-sheet outweighed the concerns regarding antecedents

Source reference: para. 6

The relief was granted subject to stringent conditions: (i) the applicant must not seek adjournments when witnesses are present; (ii) mandatory attendance on all trial dates; and (iii) personal appearance for framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 BNSS

Source reference: para. 7

Failure to comply would allow the trial court to treat the default as an abuse of liberty and proceed under Sections 209 or 269 of the BNS

Source reference: para. 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

JAGESH @ JAGGU CHOUHANvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · March 24, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment