Facts
The Petitioners are Public Charitable Trusts that operate educational institutions
Source reference: para. 2They approached the High Court challenging the levy of General Tax by the Respondent Municipal Corporation, asserting they are exempt under Section 132(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act ("the Act")
Source reference: para. 2While the Petitioners admitted liability for Education Cess and expressed willingness to pay it with interest, they contested the General Tax
Source reference: para. 2In WP 1536/2026, the Petitioner specifically disputed the imposition of Education Cess from 2020, noting that the Occupancy Certificate for the premises was only issued on March 28, 2022
Source reference: para. 12Issues
1. Whether the Petitioners are entitled to an exemption from the levy of General Tax under Section 132(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act
Source reference: para. 2, 72. Whether the Municipal Corporation can levy Education Cess for a period prior to the issuance of the Occupancy Certificate
Source reference: para. 12Law Applied
The Court primarily applied Section 132 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act
Source reference: para. 5Section 132(1)(b) mandates that General Tax shall be levied on all buildings and lands except those "solely occupied and used for public worship or for a public charitable purpose"
Source reference: para. 5, 6This is qualified by Section 132(2), which stipulates that the exemption does not apply if (a) trade or business is carried on, or (b) rent is derived from the property, regardless of how that rent is applied
Source reference: para. 5, 6The Court also referred to the Division Bench judgment in Mohammadiya Educational and Research Society, Solapur v. State of Maharashtra (2023)
Source reference: para. 3Reasoning
The Court noted that the eligibility for exemption under Section 132 is not automatic and depends on factual criteria, such as the absence of rental income and commercial use
Source reference: para. 4, 6The Respondent-Corporation argued that these various factors must be verified before granting any exemption
Source reference: para. 4The Court reasoned that to resolve the dispute, the Petitioners must be granted the opportunity to submit a formal representation to the Municipal Corporation to demonstrate their compliance with the statutory requirements for exemption
Source reference: para. 7Regarding the dispute over the commencement date of the Education Cess in WP 1536/2026, the Court held that the Petitioner must deposit the cess from the date of the Occupancy Certificate while the Corporation evaluates the claim for the preceding period as part of the overall representation
Source reference: para. 12Holding
The Court disposed of the petitions by directing the Petitioners to file a representation to the Respondent-Corporation by May 11, 2026, which must be decided by June 22, 2026
The Court held that no coercive steps shall be taken against the Petitioners until a decision is reached on the representation, and for two weeks thereafter if the order is adverse
Source reference: para. 10, 13The Petitioners were directed to deposit the Education Cess with interest by May 11, 2026
Source reference: para. 11The Court clarified that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the exemption claim, leaving all contentions open for the Corporation's review
Source reference: para. 15Original Court PDF
Akuj Charitable Trust Society, Kupwad Thr. Poa Jaykumar S. KumbharvsSangli Miraj And Kupwad City Municipal Corporation Thr. Commissioner And Ors.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in