Facts
The petitioners challenged two orders dated March 13, 2026, passed by the Charity Commissioner regarding the administration of the Asiatic Society of Mumbai
Source reference: p. 2The Society’s managing committee elections held in September 2023 were rejected by the Assistant Charity Commissioner in August 2025
Source reference: p. 2Despite their tenure expiring and the rejection of the Change Report, the committee continued to function, declaring an election program and admitting 1,467 new members through a Scrutinizing Committee whose term had also expired
Source reference: p. 3, 10, 13Following Legislative Assembly Questions regarding missing books and voter list discrepancies, an Inspector's report confirmed 2,050 missing books and procedural illegalities
Source reference: p. 5-6Consequently, the Charity Commissioner stayed the scheduled March 2024 elections and appointed a committee—including a "fit person"—to manage day-to-day affairs and finalize a valid voters' list
Source reference: p. 7-8Issues
1. Whether the impugned orders were passed in violation of the principles of natural justice due to lack of notice or hearing
Source reference: p. 8, para 132. Whether the Managing Committee had the legal authority to continue functions and admit new members after the rejection of their Change Report and the expiry of their tenure
Source reference: p. 13, para 143. Whether the Charity Commissioner possessed the statutory jurisdiction to appoint a "fit person" and interfere with the Society's electoral process
Source reference: p. 15, para 17Law Applied
The Court applied Section 30A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, which stipulates that trustees cease to perform functions upon the expiry of their tenure unless re-appointed
Source reference: p. 9-10Sections 3, 36A, and 69 of the Act, which grant the Charity Commissioner plenary powers of superintendence and the authority to issue directions for the effective administration of public trusts
Source reference: p. 9, 15Section 47 of the Act was applied, authorizing the Commissioner to make interim arrangements for trust management to ensure smooth functioning in the absence of a legally constituted committee
Source reference: p. 15Reasoning
The Court rejected the petitioners' claim of natural justice violations, noting that the Charity Commissioner held multiple hearings (March 5, 9, 11, and 12, 2026) where office bearers were present and represented by counsel
Source reference: p. 12-13On the merits, the Court found that the Managing Committee and Scrutinizing Committee became functus officio following the rejection of the Change Report on August 6, 2025, and the expiry of their terms in September 2025
Source reference: p. 13The Court reasoned that the Charity Commissioner acted within his statutory mandate under Sections 36A, 47, and 69 to prevent patent illegalities and protect the trust's assets, especially following the Inspector’s report on missing books and voter list manipulation
Source reference: p. 15Holding
The Court dismissed both Writ Petitions, holding that the Charity Commissioner was fully justified in intervening to ensure the Society is administered per its Rules and the Law
The Court affirmed the Commissioner’s order staying the election resolution of February 20, 2026, and upheld the interim arrangement of a "fit person" committee to finalize a valid voters' list and oversee new elections. All ad-interim reliefs were vacated, and the request for a stay on this judgment was rejected
Source reference: p. 15, 16Original Court PDF
Surendra Narayan KulkarnivsCharity Commissioner,, Maharashtra State
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in