Chhattisgarh High CourtAdministrative and Public LawProperty and Real Estate Law

Chhattisgarh HC Gives Kawardha Couple 45 Days’ Protection From Eviction While Collector Decides Their Appeal Against Removal Notice

TIJAN BAI SATYAVANSHIv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh HC Gives Kawardha Couple 45 Days’ Protection From Eviction While Collector Decides Their Appeal Against Removal Notice. TIJAN BAI SATYAVANSHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the petitioners should be protected from coercive action under the removal notice while their appeal and application for interim relief remained pending before the appellate authority.

The court held

The Court directed the respondent authorities not to take coercive steps against the petitioners pursuant to the removal notice dated 22 October 2026 for 45 days from 5 November 2026.

It also directed

It directed the Collector (Nazul), Kabirdham, to decide the appeal and the Section 52(2) application as expeditiously as possible, preferably within that period.

The protection would cease after 45 days, without prejudice to the petitioners’ liberty to seek further protection from the competent authority in accordance with law.

The writ petition was disposed of.

01Facts

The petitioners challenged the authorities’ proposed eviction from Plot No. 25, Sheet No. 16 D, Kawardha, pursuant to a removal notice dated 22 October 2026.

¶ 1

Petitioner No. 1 claimed the land had been leased to her in 2019–20.

¶ 1

The petitioners had appealed the order dated 22 October 2026 under Section 44(1) of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959, before the Collector (Nazul), Kabirdham, and had filed an application under Section 52(2) seeking interim relief; both remained pending.

¶ 1–3

They sought protection from coercive action while those proceedings were considered.

¶ 1–3

The State did not oppose the request and confirmed that the appeal was pending.

¶ 4

02Issues

i.Whether the petitioners should be protected from coercive action under the removal notice while their appeal and application for interim relief remained pending before the appellate authority.

¶ 3, 6

ii.Whether the appellate authority should be directed to decide the pending appeal and interim-relief application expeditiously.

¶ 6

03Law Applied

The petitioners invoked Section 44(1) of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959, to appeal the order, and Section 52(2) to seek interim relief.

¶ 1, 3

The Court applied the principle that, where an appeal and an application for interim relief are pending, the appellate authority should be afforded an opportunity to consider them; coercive action in the meantime may render the interim-relief application ineffective.

¶ 6

Provisions in the judgment · 3

Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 Section 44Section 52Section 52

04Reasoning

As the petitioners had already filed an appeal and an application for interim relief, both pending before the Collector (Nazul), the Court considered it appropriate to leave the merits for that authority to decide.

¶ 6

It found that eviction before the interim-relief application was considered could render that application infructuous, and therefore granted time-limited protection while directing the Collector to decide both matters promptly.

¶ 6–7

05Holding

The Court directed the respondent authorities not to take coercive steps against the petitioners pursuant to the removal notice dated 22 October 2026 for 45 days from 5 November 2026.

¶ 7

It directed the Collector (Nazul), Kabirdham, to decide the appeal and the Section 52(2) application as expeditiously as possible, preferably within that period.

¶ 7

The protection would cease after 45 days, without prejudice to the petitioners’ liberty to seek further protection from the competent authority in accordance with law.

¶ 8

The writ petition was disposed of.

¶ 9
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

TIJAN BAI SATYAVANSHIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · November 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment