01Facts
The petitioner stated that he or his proprietary concern, Sadguru Developers, was recorded as proprietor and was in possession of land bearing Khasra Nos. 22/4 and 22/6 at Village Goverdhanpur, Raigarh.
¶ 1–2He applied to the revenue authority on 16 September 2026 for a Chauhadi Certificate/22-Point Land Information Certificate, including the land’s boundaries and other revenue particulars.
¶ 1–2The application had not been decided despite his approaches to revenue officials, so he sought a direction for its consideration.
¶ 1–2The State submitted that the Tahsildar would decide the matter within 15 days; the Court ultimately directed decision within 30 days.
¶ 3–402Issues
i.1. Whether the competent revenue authority should be directed to consider and decide the petitioner’s application for a Chauhadi Certificate/22-Point Land Information Certificate
¶ 2–4ii.2. Whether the Court should express any view on the merits of the petitioner’s entitlement to the certificate
¶ 503Law Applied
The Court cited no specific statute, precedent, or detailed legal test.
¶ 4–5It directed the competent revenue authority to determine the application by reference to the relevant revenue records and applicable law; the authority was to examine the matter independently, without treating the Court as having decided the petitioner’s entitlement.
¶ 4–504Reasoning
The petitioner’s application remained undecided, and the State submitted that the Tahsildar would consider it.
¶ 3–5The Court therefore granted limited procedural relief by directing the competent authority to decide the application within a specified period.
¶ 3–5It did not determine whether the petitioner was entitled to the certificate or direct that it be issued.
¶ 3–505Holding
The petition was disposed of with a direction to the competent revenue authority, particularly the Tahsildar, Raigarh, to consider and decide the petitioner’s application dated 16 September 2026 within 30 days of receiving the order, strictly in accordance with the relevant revenue records and applicable law.
¶ 4–5The Court expressed no opinion on the merits of the claim.
¶ 4–5Original Court PDF
KAILASH AGRAWALvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
