Chhattisgarh High CourtAdministrative and Public LawProperty and Real Estate Law

Chhattisgarh HC Orders Raigarh Tehsildar To Decide Landowner’s Boundary-Certificate Request Within 30 Days

KAILASH AGRAWALv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh HC Orders Raigarh Tehsildar To Decide Landowner’s Boundary-Certificate Request Within 30 Days. KAILASH AGRAWAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the competent revenue authority should be directed to consider and decide the petitioner’s application for a Chauhadi Certificate/22-Point Land Information Certificate

The court held

The petition was disposed of with a direction to the competent revenue authority, particularly the Tahsildar, Raigarh, to consider and decide the petitioner’s application dated 16 September 2026 within 30 days of receiving the order, strictly in accordance with the relevant revenue records and applicable law.

It also directed

The Court expressed no opinion on the merits of the claim.

01Facts

The petitioner stated that he or his proprietary concern, Sadguru Developers, was recorded as proprietor and was in possession of land bearing Khasra Nos. 22/4 and 22/6 at Village Goverdhanpur, Raigarh.

¶ 1–2

He applied to the revenue authority on 16 September 2026 for a Chauhadi Certificate/22-Point Land Information Certificate, including the land’s boundaries and other revenue particulars.

¶ 1–2

The application had not been decided despite his approaches to revenue officials, so he sought a direction for its consideration.

¶ 1–2

The State submitted that the Tahsildar would decide the matter within 15 days; the Court ultimately directed decision within 30 days.

¶ 3–4

02Issues

i.1. Whether the competent revenue authority should be directed to consider and decide the petitioner’s application for a Chauhadi Certificate/22-Point Land Information Certificate

¶ 2–4

ii.2. Whether the Court should express any view on the merits of the petitioner’s entitlement to the certificate

¶ 5

03Law Applied

The Court cited no specific statute, precedent, or detailed legal test.

¶ 4–5

It directed the competent revenue authority to determine the application by reference to the relevant revenue records and applicable law; the authority was to examine the matter independently, without treating the Court as having decided the petitioner’s entitlement.

¶ 4–5

04Reasoning

The petitioner’s application remained undecided, and the State submitted that the Tahsildar would consider it.

¶ 3–5

The Court therefore granted limited procedural relief by directing the competent authority to decide the application within a specified period.

¶ 3–5

It did not determine whether the petitioner was entitled to the certificate or direct that it be issued.

¶ 3–5

05Holding

The petition was disposed of with a direction to the competent revenue authority, particularly the Tahsildar, Raigarh, to consider and decide the petitioner’s application dated 16 September 2026 within 30 days of receiving the order, strictly in accordance with the relevant revenue records and applicable law.

¶ 4–5

The Court expressed no opinion on the merits of the claim.

¶ 4–5
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

KAILASH AGRAWALvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · November 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment