Chhattisgarh High CourtCriminal LawCriminal Procedure and Evidence

Chhattisgarh HC Grants Bail To Accused In 10.05-Kg Ganja Case, Citing Below-Commercial Quantity And No Criminal Antecedents

SAMEER KHANv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh HC Grants Bail To Accused In 10.05-Kg Ganja Case, Citing Below-Commercial Quantity And No Criminal Antecedents. SAMEER KHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the applicant should be released on regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in the circumstances of the case.

The court held

The Court allowed the bail application.

It also directed

It directed that the applicant be released upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000 with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court, subject to conditions concerning non-interference with witnesses, conduct prejudicial to a fair and expeditious trial, and attendance at every trial date.

The Court clarified that its observations were limited to the bail application and would not affect the trial Court’s decision on the merits.

01Facts

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Crime No. 204/2026 registered under Section 20(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

¶ 1

The prosecution alleged that five persons were transporting ganja on three motorcycles and that 2.05 kg was seized from the applicant, while the total seizure from the group was 10.05 kg.

¶ 2

The applicant submitted that the total quantity was below commercial quantity, the charge-sheet had been filed, he had no criminal antecedents, and he had been in custody since 1 October 2026. The State opposed bail.

¶ 3–4

02Issues

i.Whether the applicant should be released on regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in the circumstances of the case.

¶ 1, 3–6

ii.Whether the restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act applied, given the quantity of ganja seized.

¶ 3, 6

03Law Applied

The application was made under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which empowers the High Court to grant bail.

¶ 1

The alleged offence was under Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act.

¶ 1

The Court accepted that the total seizure of 10.05 kg of ganja was below commercial quantity and that the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act therefore did not apply in this case.

¶ 3, 6

The order cites no precedent.

Provisions in the judgment · 3 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 20Section 37

04Reasoning

The Court considered the total seizure to be intermediate quantity and below commercial quantity, and noted that the charge-sheet had been filed, the applicant had no criminal antecedents, and he had been in judicial custody since 1 October 2026.

¶ 6

Given those circumstances and the likelihood that trial would take time, the Court found it appropriate to grant regular bail.

¶ 6

05Holding

The Court allowed the bail application.

¶ 6

It directed that the applicant be released upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000 with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court, subject to conditions concerning non-interference with witnesses, conduct prejudicial to a fair and expeditious trial, and attendance at every trial date.

¶ 6–7

The Court clarified that its observations were limited to the bail application and would not affect the trial Court’s decision on the merits.

¶ 8
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SAMEER KHANvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 30, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment