01Facts
On 4 September 2024, NCB officers and an RPF team searched the Puri–Durg Express and seized 11.640 kg of ganja from co-accused Saudagar Kumbhar.
¶ 1Kumbhar allegedly stated that the ganja had been supplied by co-accused Khemraj Mehar for delivery to Mukesh Modi, and that he had previously delivered ganja to Modi on Mehar’s instructions.
¶ 1Modi was arrested on 24 April 2025 and charged under Sections 8/20 and 29 of the NDPS Act.
¶ 1He sought regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, relying on the co-accused’s statement, the quantity seized being below commercial quantity, parity with the co-accused who had been granted bail, his custody, and the progress of the trial.
¶ 1–4The prosecution opposed bail, citing his similar criminal antecedents.
¶ 1–402Issues
i.Whether Modi should be granted regular bail, having regard to the quantity seized, the basis of his alleged implication, and the bail granted to the co-accused.
¶ 3, 6ii.Whether his criminal antecedents and the progress of the trial weighed against granting bail.
¶ 3–603Law Applied
The application was made under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which provides for the High Court’s or Court of Session’s power to grant bail.
¶ 1The alleged offences were under Sections 8/20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
¶ 1The Court assessed the bail request by considering the nature of the allegations, the quantity of contraband, parity with co-accused, criminal antecedents, length of custody, and progress of the trial.
¶ 6No separate precedent or statutory test was cited in the order.
¶ 6Provisions in the judgment · 4 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8Section 20Section 29
04Reasoning
The Court noted that the 11.640 kg of ganja—less than commercial quantity—was seized from Kumbhar, and that Modi’s alleged involvement rested on Kumbhar’s memorandum statement.
¶ 6It also considered that both Kumbhar and Mehar had been granted bail, supporting Modi’s claim of parity.
¶ 6Although the Court took account of Modi’s antecedents, including one pending similar case, it also noted his custody since 24 April 2025 and that nine of the twelve prosecution witnesses had been examined.
¶ 6On balance, it considered bail justified without expressing any view on the merits of the case.
¶ 605Holding
The High Court allowed the bail application.
¶ 7It directed that Modi be released on executing a personal bond of ₹50,000 with one surety for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
¶ 7Bail was subject to conditions that he not influence or dissuade persons acquainted with the case facts, not prejudice a fair and expeditious trial, and appear before the trial Court on every date until disposal of the trial.
¶ 7Original Court PDF
MUKESH MODIvsGOVERNMENT OF INDIA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
