Chhattisgarh High CourtAdministrative and Public LawConstitutional Law

Chhattisgarh HC Quashes District Panel’s Cancellation Of Teacher’s Caste Certificate, Finding It Lacked Power And Gave No Hearing

PANKAJ KUMAR SANGAMv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh HC Quashes District Panel’s Cancellation Of Teacher’s Caste Certificate, Finding It Lacked Power And Gave No Hearing. PANKAJ KUMAR SANGAM vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the District Level Certificate Verification Committee had authority to cancel the petitioner’s caste certificate.

The court held

The Court quashed the Committee’s order/inquiry report dated 6 January 2026.

It also directed

It reserved liberty for the respondents to refer the matter to the High Power Certification Scrutiny Committee, if warranted; any further proceedings must comply with the applicable statutory provisions and afford the petitioner an adequate hearing.

The petition was allowed, with no order as to costs.

01Facts

The petitioner, a Teacher (L.B.), challenged the District Level Certificate Verification Committee’s order/inquiry report dated 6 January 2026, which cancelled his caste certificate as forged and fabricated and recommended recovery of benefits and termination of his service.

¶ 1

He contended that the Committee lacked authority to cancel the certificate and that the prescribed procedure had not been followed.

¶ 2

The State submitted that the authorities would act in accordance with law.

¶ 3

02Issues

i.Whether the District Level Certificate Verification Committee had authority to cancel the petitioner’s caste certificate.

¶ 2, 4

ii.Whether the cancellation and consequential recommendations could stand when made without notice or an opportunity of hearing.

¶ 4

03Law Applied

The petitioner relied on the Chhattisgarh Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Social Status Certification) Act, 2013, contending that the District Level Committee’s role was limited to referring the matter to the High Power Certification Scrutiny Committee and that it lacked power to cancel the certificate.

¶ 2

The Court held that an authority cannot assume powers not conferred on it by statute, and that action carrying civil consequences must comply with the procedure prescribed by law and the principles of natural justice, including an adequate opportunity of hearing.

¶ 4

04Reasoning

The Committee cancelled the certificate and recommended recovery and termination without issuing notice or hearing the petitioner, despite the serious civil consequences of those actions.

¶ 4

The Court also found that the Committee could not exercise the High Power Certification Scrutiny Committee’s powers where the statute did not confer them.

¶ 4

The impugned action therefore could not stand.

¶ 4

05Holding

The Court quashed the Committee’s order/inquiry report dated 6 January 2026.

¶ 5

It reserved liberty for the respondents to refer the matter to the High Power Certification Scrutiny Committee, if warranted; any further proceedings must comply with the applicable statutory provisions and afford the petitioner an adequate hearing.

¶ 5

The petition was allowed, with no order as to costs.

¶ 6
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

PANKAJ KUMAR SANGAMvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment