01Facts
The claimant appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded for the death of her 25-year-old unmarried son, Sandeep Kumar Das, in a road accident on 30 April 2023.
The Claims Tribunal awarded ₹14,30,800, assessing his monthly income at ₹9,000.
The claimant contended that his income should have been assessed at the applicable minimum wage of ₹9,960 per month and that the award under conventional heads was inadequate.
¶ 6–7The High Court condoned a 34-day delay, admitted the appeal, and heard it finally.
¶ 1–502Issues
i.1. Whether the deceased’s monthly income should be reassessed at the applicable minimum wage of ₹9,960 rather than ₹9,000
¶ 7, 10ii.2. Whether the compensation awarded under conventional heads should be enhanced
¶ 7, 1003Law Applied
Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, provides for an appeal against an award of the Claims Tribunal.
In assessing compensation for a death, the Court applied the principles in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, Sarla Verma & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors., and Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram & Ors.
¶ 11The Court used the applicable minimum-wage notification to assess income where the claimant’s assertion of higher earnings was unsupported by documents, and applied the relevant future-prospect, personal-expense deduction, multiplier, and conventional-head calculations.
¶ 10–11Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173
04Reasoning
The deceased’s claimed earnings of ₹700 per day were not supported by documentary evidence.
¶ 10The Court therefore assessed his monthly income at ₹9,960, the minimum wage for unskilled labour under the applicable Chhattisgarh notification.
¶ 10Applying a 40% addition for future prospects, a 50% deduction for personal expenses, and a multiplier of 18, the Court calculated loss of dependency at ₹15,05,952.
¶ 10–11It also increased compensation under conventional heads from ₹70,000 to ₹84,000, resulting in total compensation of ₹15,89,952.
¶ 10–1105Holding
The appeal was partly allowed.
¶ 12–13The award was enhanced from ₹14,30,800 to ₹15,89,952, entitling the claimant to an additional ₹1,59,152 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing the claim application until realization.
¶ 12–13The remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award were left unchanged.
¶ 12–13The Registry was directed to communicate the enhanced amount to the claimant in Hindi, with paralegal assistance if required.
¶ 14Original Court PDF
SMT. PARVATI DAS VAISHNAVvsKALVINDER SINGH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
