Facts
The applications arose from Crime No. 373/2026, registered at Police Station Mandir Hasaud under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
Source reference: para. 2–3The prosecution alleged that an inspection of a fair price shop operated by Shri Radha Mohan Women’s Self-Help Group found a shortage of 1,225 quintals of food grains, valued at approximately ₹50,09,956, along with other irregularities
Source reference: para. 2–3Maya Yadav contended that she had resigned as the Group’s president in 2022; Harishankar Sahu asserted that he worked as a labourer, not as a salesman.
Source reference: para. 4–6The State opposed the applications, identifying Anju Yadav as the saleswoman.
Source reference: para. 4–6The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Source reference: para. 2Issues
Whether the applicants should be granted anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 373/2026
Source reference: para. 2, 7–9Law Applied
Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides for a direction granting bail to a person apprehending arrest.
Source reference: para. 2, 8The Court considered the nature of the allegations and the parties’ submissions in determining whether to grant that relief.
Source reference: para. 2, 8Reasoning
Having considered the facts, the nature of the allegations, counsel’s submissions, and the documents on record, the Court found it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail.
Source reference: para. 7–8It did so without expressing any view on the merits, and made release subject to cooperation with investigation, non-interference with witnesses or the fairness of trial, and attendance before the trial court.
Source reference: para. 8–9Holding
The Court allowed both applications.
In the event of arrest in Crime No. 373/2026, each applicant is to be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety for the like amount, subject to the stated conditions.
Source reference: para. 9The Registry was directed to send a certified copy of the order to the trial court for information and compliance.
Source reference: para. 10Acts & Sections Cited
5 provisions across 3 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20232
Original Court PDF
MAYA YADAVvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
