Chhattisgarh High Court
Criminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Chhattisgarh High Court grants pre-arrest bail in alleged ₹50-lakh fair-price shop grain shortage case

MAYA YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: October 01, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Chhattisgarh High Court grants pre-arrest bail in alleged ₹50-lakh fair-price shop grain shortage case. MAYA YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applications arose from Crime No. 373/2026, registered at Police Station Mandir Hasaud under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

Source reference: para. 2–3

The prosecution alleged that an inspection of a fair price shop operated by Shri Radha Mohan Women’s Self-Help Group found a shortage of 1,225 quintals of food grains, valued at approximately ₹50,09,956, along with other irregularities

Source reference: para. 2–3

Maya Yadav contended that she had resigned as the Group’s president in 2022; Harishankar Sahu asserted that he worked as a labourer, not as a salesman.

Source reference: para. 4–6

The State opposed the applications, identifying Anju Yadav as the saleswoman.

Source reference: para. 4–6

The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Source reference: para. 2
02

Issues

Whether the applicants should be granted anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 373/2026

Source reference: para. 2, 7–9
03

Law Applied

Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides for a direction granting bail to a person apprehending arrest.

Source reference: para. 2, 8

The Court considered the nature of the allegations and the parties’ submissions in determining whether to grant that relief.

Source reference: para. 2, 8
04

Reasoning

Having considered the facts, the nature of the allegations, counsel’s submissions, and the documents on record, the Court found it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail.

Source reference: para. 7–8

It did so without expressing any view on the merits, and made release subject to cooperation with investigation, non-interference with witnesses or the fairness of trial, and attendance before the trial court.

Source reference: para. 8–9
05

Holding

The Court allowed both applications.

In the event of arrest in Crime No. 373/2026, each applicant is to be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety for the like amount, subject to the stated conditions.

Source reference: para. 9

The Registry was directed to send a certified copy of the order to the trial court for information and compliance.

Source reference: para. 10
06

Acts & Sections Cited

5 provisions across 3 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20232

Essential Commodities Act, 19552

Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

MAYA YADAVvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 01, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment