01Facts
The petitioner in CP No. 266/2026, the child’s father, sought transfer of the maternal grandparents’ guardianship proceeding, G&WC No. 1/2026, from the Senior Civil Judge, Tarikere, to the Family Court, Davanagere.
p. 4 · p. 6The grandparents sought, in CP No. 383/2026, transfer of the father’s custody proceeding, G&WC No. 30/2025, from Davanagere to Tarikere.
p. 4 · p. 6The parents had married in 2022 and their son was born in 2023.
p. 4 · p. 7After the mother died by suicide in March 2024, the grandparents took custody of the child.
p. 4 · p. 7The child was residing with them at Tarikere, a fact not disputed before the Court.
p. 4 · p. 702Issues
i.Whether the father’s custody proceeding, G&WC No. 30/2025, should be transferred from Davanagere to Tarikere, where the child ordinarily resided.
p. 5 · p. 7ii.Whether the grandparents’ guardianship proceeding, G&WC No. 1/2026, should be transferred from Tarikere to Davanagere.
p. 5 · p. 703Law Applied
Section 9 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 requires a petition concerning guardianship or custody of a minor to be presented to the court having jurisdiction over the place where the minor ordinarily resides.
p. 6Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 empowers the High Court to transfer proceedings between competent courts.
p. 2 · p. 3 · p. 6The Court also considered the Division Bench decision in Priyanka V. v. Prashanth D. Veerapur [2026:KHC:44975-DB], which states that circumstances preceding the dispute are relevant and a party cannot create a different forum merely by taking the child from one place to another.
p. 5Provisions in the judgment · 2 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 24
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 Section 9
04Reasoning
Since the child was living with the grandparents at Tarikere and that residence was undisputed, the Court held that the Davanagere custody proceeding was not maintainable under Section 9.
p. 6For the same reason, it was inappropriate to transfer the Tarikere guardianship proceeding to Davanagere.
p. 6The appropriate course was to have both matters heard at Tarikere, while directing expedition and recording the parties’ undertaking to cooperate.
p. 6 · p. 805Holding
The Court dismissed CP No. 266/2026 and allowed CP No. 383/2026.
p. 8It withdrew G&WC No. 30/2025 from the Family Court, Davanagere, and transferred it to the Senior Civil Judge, Tarikere, to be tried with G&WC No. 1/2026.
p. 8The transferee court was directed to expedite the proceedings, and both parties’ undertaking to cooperate was recorded.
p. 8Original Court PDF
SRI KRISHNAPPAvsDR RAGHUNATHA K R
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
