Karnataka High CourtFamily LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Child Living With Maternal Grandparents In Tarikere: Karnataka HC Moves Father’s Custody Case There For Joint Hearing

SRI KRISHNAPPAv.DR RAGHUNATHA K R

Child Living With Maternal Grandparents In Tarikere: Karnataka HC Moves Father’s Custody Case There For Joint Hearing. SRI KRISHNAPPA vs DR RAGHUNATHA K R. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the father’s custody proceeding, G&WC No. 30/2025, should be transferred from Davanagere to Tarikere, where the child ordinarily resided.

The court held

The Court dismissed CP No. 266/2026 and allowed CP No. 383/2026.

It also directed

It withdrew G&WC No. 30/2025 from the Family Court, Davanagere, and transferred it to the Senior Civil Judge, Tarikere, to be tried with G&WC No. 1/2026.

The transferee court was directed to expedite the proceedings, and both parties’ undertaking to cooperate was recorded.

01Facts

The petitioner in CP No. 266/2026, the child’s father, sought transfer of the maternal grandparents’ guardianship proceeding, G&WC No. 1/2026, from the Senior Civil Judge, Tarikere, to the Family Court, Davanagere.

p. 4 · p. 6

The grandparents sought, in CP No. 383/2026, transfer of the father’s custody proceeding, G&WC No. 30/2025, from Davanagere to Tarikere.

p. 4 · p. 6

The parents had married in 2022 and their son was born in 2023.

p. 4 · p. 7

After the mother died by suicide in March 2024, the grandparents took custody of the child.

p. 4 · p. 7

The child was residing with them at Tarikere, a fact not disputed before the Court.

p. 4 · p. 7

02Issues

i.Whether the father’s custody proceeding, G&WC No. 30/2025, should be transferred from Davanagere to Tarikere, where the child ordinarily resided.

p. 5 · p. 7

ii.Whether the grandparents’ guardianship proceeding, G&WC No. 1/2026, should be transferred from Tarikere to Davanagere.

p. 5 · p. 7

03Law Applied

Section 9 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 requires a petition concerning guardianship or custody of a minor to be presented to the court having jurisdiction over the place where the minor ordinarily resides.

p. 6

Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 empowers the High Court to transfer proceedings between competent courts.

p. 2 · p. 3 · p. 6

The Court also considered the Division Bench decision in Priyanka V. v. Prashanth D. Veerapur [2026:KHC:44975-DB], which states that circumstances preceding the dispute are relevant and a party cannot create a different forum merely by taking the child from one place to another.

p. 5

Provisions in the judgment · 2 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 24

Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 Section 9

04Reasoning

Since the child was living with the grandparents at Tarikere and that residence was undisputed, the Court held that the Davanagere custody proceeding was not maintainable under Section 9.

p. 6

For the same reason, it was inappropriate to transfer the Tarikere guardianship proceeding to Davanagere.

p. 6

The appropriate course was to have both matters heard at Tarikere, while directing expedition and recording the parties’ undertaking to cooperate.

p. 6 · p. 8

05Holding

The Court dismissed CP No. 266/2026 and allowed CP No. 383/2026.

p. 8

It withdrew G&WC No. 30/2025 from the Family Court, Davanagere, and transferred it to the Senior Civil Judge, Tarikere, to be tried with G&WC No. 1/2026.

p. 8

The transferee court was directed to expedite the proceedings, and both parties’ undertaking to cooperate was recorded.

p. 8
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI KRISHNAPPAvsDR RAGHUNATHA K R

Karnataka High Court · November 06, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment