CAT - ['Delhi']

Competent Authority Directed to Decide Pending Representation for Financial Upgradation via Reasoned and Speaking Order

Ram Lal vs DEFENCE

CAT - ['Delhi']JUDGMENT: May 04, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Two applicants, Sh. Ram Lal (Ex-Mali) and Sh. Bhoja Ram (Ex-Chowkidar), both retired senior citizens, filed an Original Application (O.A.) under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985

Source reference: p. 1-2

They sought the quashing of orders dated April 3, 2025, and a direction for the grant of Grade Pay of Rs. 2,800/- (Pay Band-1) effective from January 1, 2006, along with 7th CPC financial upgradations and pension arrears with interest @ 9% p.a.

Source reference: p. 2-3

While their representations dated March 7, 2025, had been forwarded to the Directorate General of Medical Services (DGMS)-3B (the cadre controlling authority) via a communication dated April 3, 2025, no final decision had been communicated to them

Source reference: p. 3-4
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicants may be permitted to join together in a single O.A. under a common cause of action

Source reference: p. 2, para 1

2. Whether the respondants should be directed to decide the pending representations regarding pay scale fitment and financial upgradation within a specified timeline

Source reference: p. 3-4, para 4
03

Law Applied

The Tribunal applied the procedural provisions of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, specifically Section 19 regarding the jurisdiction to entertain grievances of government servants

Source reference: p. 2

It also adhered to the Principles of Natural Justice, which necessitate that administrative representations related to service benefits be decided through reasoned and speaking orders within a reasonable timeframe

Source reference: p. 3-4, para 4
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal first addressed the Miscellaneous Application (M.A.) for joining together, finding that since both applicants sought common relief against a common cause of action, the joinder was permissible

Source reference: p. 2, para 2

Regarding the merits, the Tribunal noted that the applicants' counsel limited the prayer to a request for a timely disposal of their pending representations

Source reference: p. 3, para 2

The Bench observed that while the 187 Military Hospital had forwarded the representations to the DGMS-3B on April 3, 2025, the matter remained stagnant

Source reference: p. 3-4, para 4

Applying the principles of natural justice and administrative efficiency, the Tribunal determined that the competent authority is duty-bound to pass a "reasoned and speaking order" to resolve the grievances of the retired employees without the court unnecessarily delving into the merits of the pay-scale claims at this premature stage

Source reference: p. 4, para 5
05

Holding

The Tribunal allowed M.A. No. 2233/2026 for joining together

On the main O.A., the Tribunal directed the competent authority (respondents) to consider and decide the applicants’ pending representations dated March 7, 2025, by passing a reasoned and speaking order within four weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of the order

Source reference: p. 4, para 4

The O.A. was disposed of at the admission stage without any order as to costs, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the pay-scale claim

Source reference: p. 4, para 7-9
CAT - ['Delhi']

Original Court PDF

Ram LalvsDEFENCE

CAT - ['Delhi'] · May 04, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment