Facts
Two applicants, Sh. Ram Lal (Ex-Mali) and Sh. Bhoja Ram (Ex-Chowkidar), both retired senior citizens, filed an Original Application (O.A.) under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Source reference: p. 1-2They sought the quashing of orders dated April 3, 2025, and a direction for the grant of Grade Pay of Rs. 2,800/- (Pay Band-1) effective from January 1, 2006, along with 7th CPC financial upgradations and pension arrears with interest @ 9% p.a.
Source reference: p. 2-3While their representations dated March 7, 2025, had been forwarded to the Directorate General of Medical Services (DGMS)-3B (the cadre controlling authority) via a communication dated April 3, 2025, no final decision had been communicated to them
Source reference: p. 3-4Issues
1. Whether the applicants may be permitted to join together in a single O.A. under a common cause of action
Source reference: p. 2, para 12. Whether the respondants should be directed to decide the pending representations regarding pay scale fitment and financial upgradation within a specified timeline
Source reference: p. 3-4, para 4Law Applied
The Tribunal applied the procedural provisions of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, specifically Section 19 regarding the jurisdiction to entertain grievances of government servants
Source reference: p. 2It also adhered to the Principles of Natural Justice, which necessitate that administrative representations related to service benefits be decided through reasoned and speaking orders within a reasonable timeframe
Source reference: p. 3-4, para 4Reasoning
The Tribunal first addressed the Miscellaneous Application (M.A.) for joining together, finding that since both applicants sought common relief against a common cause of action, the joinder was permissible
Source reference: p. 2, para 2Regarding the merits, the Tribunal noted that the applicants' counsel limited the prayer to a request for a timely disposal of their pending representations
Source reference: p. 3, para 2The Bench observed that while the 187 Military Hospital had forwarded the representations to the DGMS-3B on April 3, 2025, the matter remained stagnant
Source reference: p. 3-4, para 4Applying the principles of natural justice and administrative efficiency, the Tribunal determined that the competent authority is duty-bound to pass a "reasoned and speaking order" to resolve the grievances of the retired employees without the court unnecessarily delving into the merits of the pay-scale claims at this premature stage
Source reference: p. 4, para 5Holding
The Tribunal allowed M.A. No. 2233/2026 for joining together
On the main O.A., the Tribunal directed the competent authority (respondents) to consider and decide the applicants’ pending representations dated March 7, 2025, by passing a reasoned and speaking order within four weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of the order
Source reference: p. 4, para 4The O.A. was disposed of at the admission stage without any order as to costs, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the pay-scale claim
Source reference: p. 4, para 7-9Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Administrative Tribunals Act, 19851
Original Court PDF
Ram LalvsDEFENCE
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
