Facts
The applicant was arrested on 13 July 2026 in connection with Crime No. 78/2026, registered at Police Station Raghunathnagar under Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act.
Source reference: paras. 1–2The prosecution alleged that 2.224 kg of ganja was found in his possession near Kesari Chowk and was intended for sale.
Source reference: paras. 1–2The applicant denied the allegation, asserted that no contraband had been seized from his exclusive possession, and submitted that he had no criminal antecedents and had been in custody since his arrest.
Source reference: para. 3The charge-sheet had been filed.
Source reference: para. 3The State opposed bail, asserting that the contraband had been seized from the applicant, but did not dispute the absence of other criminal antecedents.
Source reference: para. 4Issues
Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in the circumstances of the case.
Source reference: paras. 1, 5–6Law Applied
The application was made under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which the Court invoked as the basis for considering regular bail.
Source reference: para. 1The alleged offence was under Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act.
Source reference: para. 1In deciding bail, the Court considered the nature of the allegations, the applicant’s lack of criminal antecedents, the period of custody, completion of the investigation and filing of the charge-sheet, and the expected time for trial.
Source reference: para. 6Reasoning
The Court considered the alleged recovery alongside the applicant’s asserted lack of antecedents, which the State did not dispute.
Source reference: paras. 4–6It also noted that the applicant had been in custody for more than two and a half months, the charge-sheet had been filed, and the trial would take considerable time to conclude.
Source reference: paras. 4–6On those grounds, and without expressing any opinion on the merits, the Court found bail appropriate.
Source reference: paras. 4–6Holding
The Court allowed the application and directed the applicant’s release on regular bail on furnishing a bond of ₹25,000 with one surety for the like amount, to the satisfaction of the trial court.
Release is subject to conditions concerning adjournments, attendance at trial, compliance if a proclamation is issued, and personal appearance on specified trial dates.
Source reference: para. 7(a)–(d)A certified copy was directed to be sent to the trial court.
Source reference: para. 8Acts & Sections Cited
6 provisions across 3 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20233
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20232
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 19851
Original Court PDF
ANISH KUMAR PANIKAvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
