Gujarat High Court

Compounding of Offence Under Section 138 of NI Act Permitted Post-Conviction Upon Forfeiture of Cheque Amount

MAHESH MANSUKHBHAI BHESANIYA vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Gujarat High CourtJUDGMENT: May 12, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner was the original accused in a criminal complaint filed by respondent No. 2 (HDFC Bank) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Source reference: para. 6

On November 7, 2025, the 9th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Rajkot convicted the petitioner in Criminal Case No. 511 of 2023.

Source reference: para. 5(b)

Following the conviction, the petitioner arranged funds and paid the full cheque amount of ₹65,346/- to the complainant bank.

Source reference: para. 6.1

Both parties subsequently approached the High Court seeking to quash the conviction and sentence based on an amicable settlement.

Source reference: para. 7.1
02

Issues

1. Whether the High Court can exercise its inherent powers to quash a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties have reached an amicable settlement post-conviction.

Source reference: para. 10
03

Law Applied

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which governs the dishonour of cheques for insufficiency of funds.

Source reference: para. 6

Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. / Section 528 of the BNSS regarding inherent powers to quash proceedings to subserve the ends of justice.

Source reference: para. 10

The legal principle applied is that offenses under the N.I. Act are essentially civil in nature and compoundable, allowing for settlement even at the post-conviction stage to restore harmony between parties.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The court evaluated the settlement through an affidavit dated May 11, 2026, submitted by the authorized representative of HDFC Bank, which confirmed the receipt of the cheque amount.

Source reference: para. 7

The court verified the settlement further through a virtual appearance of the bank's representative, who expressed "no objection" to the quashing of the conviction.

Source reference: para. 7.2

Reasoning that the dispute was private and financial, and that the parties had resolved their grievances, the court determined that maintaining the conviction would serve no purpose and that quashing the proceedings was necessary to meet the ends of justice.

Source reference: para. 10
05

Holding

The Court answered the issue in the affirmative, holding that this was a fit case to exercise inherent powers to quash the conviction.

The petition was allowed, and the judgment and order of conviction dated November 7, 2025, passed by the 9th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajkot, in Criminal Case No. 511 of 2023, were quashed and set aside.

Source reference: para. 10-11
Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

MAHESH MANSUKHBHAI BHESANIYAvsSTATE OF GUJARAT

Gujarat High Court · May 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment