Facts
The Contempt Petition (C) No. 180/00027/2022 was filed in relation to O.A No. 180/00114/2021.
Source reference: no citationWhen the matter was heard, the learned Senior Panel Counsel (SPC) presented a completion report.
Source reference: no citationThis report indicated that the remaining balance of an unspecified amount, specifically Rs. 29,120/-, had been paid to the petitioners.
Source reference: no citationA copy of the JCDA, Kochi pay slip DV No. 94 was also enclosed as proof of payment.
Source reference: p.3The learned counsel representing the petitioners confirmed to the Tribunal that the original order had been fully complied with.
Source reference: p.3Issues
1. Whether the order issued in O.A No. 180/00114/2021 has been fully complied with by the respondents.
Source reference: p.3Law Applied
The central principle applied by the Tribunal was the fulfillment of prior judicial orders, specifically regarding the payment of a financial amount stipulated in an earlier order.
Source reference: no citationThe Tribunal assessed compliance based on the production of a completion report and proof of payment, coupled with the petitioner's acknowledgment of full satisfaction.
Source reference: p.3Reasoning
The Tribunal’s reasoning was straightforward, focusing solely on the compliance with its prior order.
Source reference: no citationUpon review of the completion report, which confirmed the payment of Rs. 29,120/-, and the enclosed pay slip, the Tribunal found sufficient evidence of compliance.
Source reference: no citationThis was further corroborated by the petitioners' counsel, who explicitly stated that the original order had been fully satisfied.
Source reference: no citationThe Court connected these facts directly to the issue of whether the contempt petition could be closed, concluding that the actions taken by the respondents addressed the terms of the original order.
Source reference: p.3Holding
The Tribunal concluded that the order issued in O.A No. 180/00114/2021 had been fully complied with.
Therefore, the Contempt Petition (C) No. 180/00027/2022 was closed, recording full satisfaction.
Source reference: p.3The order of personal appearance was withdrawn, and any standing notices were discharged.
Source reference: p.3No costs were awarded.
Source reference: p.3Original Court PDF
K. Raveendra Kumar & Ors. v. Dr. Ajaykumar, Secretary to Government of India & Ors. Contempt Petition (C) No. 180/00027/2022 in O.A No. 180/00114/2021
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in