Facts
The petitioners, Group 'C' employees of Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL), filed a Contempt Petition (C.P. No. 32/2025) alleging non-compliance with the Tribunal's directions in O.A. No. 1418/2020
Source reference: p. 1-3During the hearing on March 18, 2026, the respondents informed the Tribunal that the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi had stayed the operation of the order passed in the original application (OA) which was the subject of the contempt proceedings
Source reference: para 1Issues
Whether the Contempt Petition can proceed while the underlying order of the Tribunal is stayed by the Hon’ble High Court
Source reference: para 1, 3Law Applied
The Tribunal relied on the general principles of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and judicial discipline, which establish that contempt proceedings cannot be pursued for the enforcement of an order that has been stayed by a superior court
Source reference: para 1, 3Reasoning
The Tribunal considered the respondents' categorical statement regarding the stay granted by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi
Source reference: para 1It determined that because the parent order in O.A. No. 1418/2020 was no longer currently enforceable due to the stay, the contempt proceedings must be closed
Source reference: para 3The Tribunal acknowledged the petitioners' request for liberty to revive the matter or take legal recourse depending on the outcome of the High Court proceedings
Source reference: para 2-3Holding
The Tribunal closed the Contempt Petition and discharged the notices issued to the respondents
It granted the petitioners liberty to revive the petition in accordance with law, if necessary, following the resolution of the stay
Source reference: para 3All pending Miscellaneous Applications (MAs) were disposed of with no order as to costs
Source reference: para 4-5Original Court PDF
Dilip Yashwant GhadivsNEERAJ MITTAL SECRETARY & ORS M/O COMMUNICATIONS
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in