Facts
The petitioners, who were initially appointed on a contractual basis, filed Original Applications (OAs) before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) seeking regularisation of their services on the ground of long-term continuous employment.
Source reference: p.5The Tribunal issued notice in the OAs and granted time for filing replies but did not pass any interim order protecting the petitioners’ employment status.
Source reference: p.5Aggrieved by the lack of interim protection pending the disposal of their OAs, the petitioners filed these writ petitions before the Delhi High Court.
Source reference: p.6Issues
Whether the petitioners are entitled to interim protection against disengagement of their services pending the adjudication of their claims for regularisation before the Tribunal.
Source reference: p.6Law Applied
The Court exercised its extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Source reference: p.5-6The Court applied the principle of maintaining the status quo in service matters where contractual employees have served for "long periods of time" and their claims for regularisation are pending adjudication to prevent the petitions from becoming infructuous.
Source reference: p.5-6Reasoning
The Court noted that although the petitions were technically filed against the Tribunal's "notice-issuing" orders, the core grievance was the lack of interim protection for the petitioners' services.
Source reference: p.6While acknowledging that there is a "considerable body of law" regarding the regularisation of contractual employees, the Court focused on the immediate necessity of protecting the petitioners' current employment status until the Tribunal could hear the matters on the merit.
Source reference: p.6The Court observed that the OAs were already scheduled for a hearing on May 28, 2026, and determined that the interests of justice would be served by ensuring the petitioners are not terminated in the interim.
Source reference: p.6Holding
The High Court disposed of the writ petitions by providing a specific clarification/direction that the petitioners’ services shall not be disengaged by the respondents pending the final disposal of the OAs before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
The court clarified that this order was intended to bridge the period until the Tribunal’s next scheduled hearing.
Source reference: p.6Original Court PDF
Ramesh Chand Yadav And OrsvsGovt Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in