Facts
The Petitioners, members of the Jai Lakshmi Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd., sought directions for the expeditious conduct of Society elections
Source reference: p. 2The previous Managing Committee's term ended on July 30, 2024, leading to the appointment of a series of Administrators/Returning Officers (RO) by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies (RCS)
Source reference: p. 2Elections held in March 2025 resulted in only three elected members, as other nominations were rejected
Source reference: p. 2Subsequent RO appointments faced hurdles: some appointees refused to join, while another, Mr. Kewal Singh, faced allegations of financial misappropriation and refused to hand over charge
Source reference: p. 2-3The current RO, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, was unable to function as the Society’s office remained locked by his predecessor
Source reference: p. 3Despite RCS instructions to the SDM to break open the locks, no action was taken until the filing of this petition
Source reference: p. 3Issues
1. Whether the Court should intervene to compel the state authorities to facilitate the handover of Society records and properties to the appointed Administrator.
Source reference: p. 3-42. Whether a specific timeline should be mandated for the conduct of the Society's pending elections.
Source reference: p. 5Law Applied
The Court primarily applied the provisions of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003, and the Delhi Co-operative Societies Rules, 2007, which govern the administration and election procedures of co-operative societies
Source reference: p. 5Specifically, it referenced Section 38(1)(c) regarding the authorization to search and break open premises to secure records, and Section 38(3) regarding the recovery of expenses for such proceedings
Source reference: p. 4-5The Court also exercised its extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India to ensure the democratic functioning of the Society
Source reference: p. 1-2Reasoning
The Court observed a significant administrative deadlock where successive RO appointments failed to result in a functional Managing Committee due to non-cooperation by a previous administrator
Source reference: p. 2-3It noted the SDM's delayed response to the RCS's directions but highlighted that during the pendency of the matter, the SDM finally issued an order dated April 23, 2026, to break open the locks and seize records
Source reference: p. 3-4The Court reasoned that to resolve the impasse, the current RO's term must be renewed immediately to provide legal continuity
Source reference: p. 5By validating the SDM's schedule for site execution and directing police assistance, the Court aimed to restore the RO’s control over Society assets, which is a prerequisite for a lawful election process under the 2003 Act and 2007 Rules
Source reference: p. 4-5Holding
The Court directed the RCS to renew the term of the current Administrator/RO, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, within one week
It ordered the implementation of the SDM's order dated April 23, 2026, to break open the Society's locks on April 28, 2026, and transfer all records to the new Administrator
Source reference: p. 5The Court held that the Administrator must conduct elections and declare results in accordance with the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act and Rules, setting a final deadline of September 30, 2026, for the completion of the entire process
Source reference: p. 5Original Court PDF
Mr Arvind Prabhakar & Ors.vsLieutenant Governer Of Delhi & Ors.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in