Chhattisgarh High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Crash Victim With 80% Permanent Disability Gets Rs 50,000 More For Future Treatment From Chhattisgarh HC

AMIT LAHREv.SUJEET KUMAR RANA

Crash Victim With 80% Permanent Disability Gets Rs 50,000 More For Future Treatment From Chhattisgarh HC. AMIT LAHRE vs SUJEET KUMAR RANA. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the claimant was entitled to additional compensation for future medical treatment, given his 80% permanent disability and ongoing treatment needs.

The court held

The Court partly allowed the appeal and awarded an additional ₹50,000 for future treatment expenses, carrying interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim application until realization.

It also directed

The remainder of the Tribunal’s award and its conditions remained unchanged.

01Facts

Amit Lahre, injured in a road accident on 27 August 2022, sustained a head injury resulting in paraplegia and 80% permanent disability.

¶ 1-4

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded him ₹32,81,873, but made no award for future medical expenses.

¶ 1-4

Lahre appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, limiting his challenge to that omission and seeking additional compensation for future treatment.

¶ 1-4

The medical evidence included a disability certificate and records of his treatment at several hospitals; the doctor who examined him confirmed his permanent disability and inability to move and walk.

¶ 7-9

02Issues

i.Whether the claimant was entitled to additional compensation for future medical treatment, given his 80% permanent disability and ongoing treatment needs.

¶ 4, 10

03Law Applied

Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for an appeal against an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

¶ 1

The Court applied the principle that compensation for future treatment may be awarded where the medical evidence, nature of the injury, and treatment records support a continuing need for care.

¶ 10

No precedent was cited.

¶ 10

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

04Reasoning

The doctor’s evidence and the Medical Board’s certificate established the claimant’s 80% permanent disability, while the medical records documented extensive treatment following the accident.

¶ 7-10

The claimant’s severe physical limitations and the nature of his neurological injury supported the conclusion that further treatment could not be ruled out.

¶ 7-10

Because the Tribunal had awarded nothing under this head, the Court considered an additional award appropriate.

¶ 7-10

05Holding

The Court partly allowed the appeal and awarded an additional ₹50,000 for future treatment expenses, carrying interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim application until realization.

¶ 10-12

The remainder of the Tribunal’s award and its conditions remained unchanged.

¶ 10-12
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

AMIT LAHREvsSUJEET KUMAR RANA

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment