Facts
The applicant was arrested on January 25, 2026, in connection with Crime No. 71/2026 registered at Police Station Balodabazar.
Source reference: para. 1-2Based on secret information, police conducted a search near Latuwa Shukkabhatha Road and allegedly seized 7.020 bulk litres of country-made “Romeo Masala” liquor from the applicant and a co-accused.
Source reference: para. 2The applicant was charged under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act.
Source reference: para. 1Following the investigation, a charge-sheet was filed.
Source reference: para. 3The applicant has been in custody since the date of arrest and has one previous criminal antecedent under the Excise Act.
Source reference: para. 3-4Issues
Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in view of the nature of the offence and the duration of pretrial detention.
Source reference: para. 1, 6Law Applied
The court applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which provides the procedural framework for regular bail.
Source reference: para. 1The substantive offence is governed by Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, which carries a minimum punishment of one year and a maximum of three years.
Source reference: para. 3The court referenced Sections 84, 209, 269, and 351 of the BNSS and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) to establish conditions for the applicant’s conduct and appearance during the trial.
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The Court examined the facts and circumstances, noting that while the applicant has a previous criminal record under the same Act, the charge-sheet in the present matter has already been filed.
Source reference: para. 6The Court balanced the gravity of the allegations—involving 7.020 bulk litres of liquor—against the fact that the applicant had been in jail since January 25, 2026.
Source reference: para. 6Observing that the maximum prescribed punishment for the offence is three years and that the trial’s conclusion is likely to take considerable time, the Court reasoned that further incarceration was not warranted.
Source reference: para. 3, 6The Court emphasized that the applicant must adhere to strict procedural conditions to ensure he does not abuse the liberty of bail or delay the trial process.
Source reference: para. 7Holding
The High Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on a personal bond with two sureties.
The holding is subject to specific conditions: (i) the applicant shall not seek adjournments when witnesses are present; (ii) the applicant must appear personally on every hearing date unless excused, per Section 269 of BNS; (iii) any failure to appear following a proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS will trigger proceedings under Section 209 of BNS; and (iv) the applicant must be present for the opening of the case, framing of charges, and recording of statements under Section 351 of BNSS.
Source reference: para. 7Original Court PDF
NARENDRA VERMAvsTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in