Facts
The applicant, widow of a deceased Assistant Commissioner of Customs, challenged a communication dated 13 August 2026 concerning her claim for revised pay and pension benefits for her husband from 1 January 1996.
Source reference: p.1–2She sought pay refixation, arrears, a revised Pension Payment Order, consequential benefits, interest and costs.
Source reference: p.1–2The Tribunal noted that the claim raised the same issue as OA No. 957/2023 and connected matters, which it had decided on 17 April 2026.
Source reference: p.3Issues
1. Whether the applicant’s claim for revised pay and consequential pension benefits was governed by the Tribunal’s decision in OA No. 957/2023 and connected matters.
Source reference: p.32. Whether the applicant was entitled to relief on the same terms as those directed in that decision.
Source reference: p.4Law Applied
The Tribunal applied its directions in OA No. 957/2023 and connected matters.
Source reference: p.3In that decision, it directed the Department of Revenue to provide Inspectors the pay scale of Rs. 6,500–10,500 and Superintendents the pay scale of Rs. 7,500–12,000 notionally from 1 January 1996 and actually from 21 April 2004, with consequential benefits, including pension.
Source reference: p.3The Tribunal stated that this approach would promote uniformity and avoid further litigation.
Source reference: p.3Reasoning
Having found that the present OA involved the same issue and sought the same relief as OA No. 957/2023 and connected matters, the Tribunal adopted the earlier decision’s directions without separately analysing the applicant’s individual entitlement or the impugned communication.
Source reference: p.3–4It therefore disposed of the OA on the same lines as the earlier matters.
Source reference: p.4Holding
The OA was disposed of on the same lines as OA No. 957/2023 and connected matters.
The incorporated directions required the Department of Revenue to revise the specified pay scales notionally from 1 January 1996 and actually from 21 April 2004, with consequential benefits, including pension, within two months of receiving the earlier order.
Source reference: p.3No order as to costs was made.
Source reference: p.4Original Court PDF
K BharathivsREVENUE
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
![Customs Officer’s Widow Gets CAT’s 1996 Pay-Revision Directions Applied to Her Pension Claim. K Bharathi vs REVENUE. CAT - ['Chennai']. LawLens](/stories/thumbnails/customs-officers-widow-gets-cats-1996-pay-revision-directions-applied-to-her-pension-claim-ab1d574834b145aaaf330528fbd9c437.webp)