CAT - ['Chennai']

Customs Officer’s Widow Gets CAT’s 1996 Pay-Revision Directions Applied to Her Pension Claim

K Bharathi vs REVENUE

CAT - ['Chennai']JUDGMENT: September 22, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Customs Officer’s Widow Gets CAT’s 1996 Pay-Revision Directions Applied to Her Pension Claim. K Bharathi vs REVENUE. CAT - ['Chennai']. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, widow of a deceased Assistant Commissioner of Customs, challenged a communication dated 13 August 2026 concerning her claim for revised pay and pension benefits for her husband from 1 January 1996.

Source reference: p.1–2

She sought pay refixation, arrears, a revised Pension Payment Order, consequential benefits, interest and costs.

Source reference: p.1–2

The Tribunal noted that the claim raised the same issue as OA No. 957/2023 and connected matters, which it had decided on 17 April 2026.

Source reference: p.3
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant’s claim for revised pay and consequential pension benefits was governed by the Tribunal’s decision in OA No. 957/2023 and connected matters.

Source reference: p.3

2. Whether the applicant was entitled to relief on the same terms as those directed in that decision.

Source reference: p.4
03

Law Applied

The Tribunal applied its directions in OA No. 957/2023 and connected matters.

Source reference: p.3

In that decision, it directed the Department of Revenue to provide Inspectors the pay scale of Rs. 6,500–10,500 and Superintendents the pay scale of Rs. 7,500–12,000 notionally from 1 January 1996 and actually from 21 April 2004, with consequential benefits, including pension.

Source reference: p.3

The Tribunal stated that this approach would promote uniformity and avoid further litigation.

Source reference: p.3
04

Reasoning

Having found that the present OA involved the same issue and sought the same relief as OA No. 957/2023 and connected matters, the Tribunal adopted the earlier decision’s directions without separately analysing the applicant’s individual entitlement or the impugned communication.

Source reference: p.3–4

It therefore disposed of the OA on the same lines as the earlier matters.

Source reference: p.4
05

Holding

The OA was disposed of on the same lines as OA No. 957/2023 and connected matters.

The incorporated directions required the Department of Revenue to revise the specified pay scales notionally from 1 January 1996 and actually from 21 April 2004, with consequential benefits, including pension, within two months of receiving the earlier order.

Source reference: p.3

No order as to costs was made.

Source reference: p.4
CAT - ['Chennai']

Original Court PDF

K BharathivsREVENUE

CAT - ['Chennai'] · September 22, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment