Facts
The applicants, Swatchhta Karamcharis, filed an Original Application seeking relief regarding arrears of salary, bonus, wages, and allowances
Source reference: p.1-2, p.3Applicant No. 3, Smt. Rajesh W/o Sh. Mukesh, instructed her counsel to withdraw her claim from the OA
Source reference: p.3The respondents stated that part payment had already been made to the remaining applicants
Source reference: p.3The respondents further submitted a list of remaining arrears to be paid to the remaining applicants
Source reference: p.3-4The counsel for the applicants expressed satisfaction with the respondents' actions and their promise to release future payments
Source reference: p.5Issues
Whether the Original Application should be disposed of with respect to Applicant No. 3, Smt. Rajesh W/o Sh. Mukesh, due to her instruction to withdraw her claim
Source reference: p.3Whether the remaining applicants are entitled to the remaining payments of arrears along with interest on delayed payment of retiral dues
Source reference: p.3, p.5Law Applied
The court primarily applied the principle established in O.A. No. 2821/2023, titled *Rajbir Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi Ors.*, decided by the Full Bench of this Tribunal on 30.10.2025
Source reference: p.5This precedent dictates that on delayed payment of GPF, pension, Gratuity, etc., interest is payable at the rate of GPF for the relevant years, calculated on a compound interest basis
Source reference: p.5Reasoning
The court noted that Applicant No. 3, Smt. Rajesh, had withdrawn her claim, leading to the disposal of the OA with respect to her
Source reference: p.3For the remaining applicants, while acknowledging the respondents' submission of due amounts and their commitment to make payments, the court found the facts identical to *Rajbir Singh (Supra)*
Source reference: p.3-4, p.5Therefore, the established principle regarding interest on delayed payments of retiral dues, including GPF, pension, and gratuity, was applied to ensure the remaining applicants receive not only the outstanding amounts but also appropriate interest as per the precedent
Source reference: p.5-6Holding
The OA was disposed of.
The claim of Applicant No. 3, Smt. Rajesh W/o Sh. Mukesh, was disposed of as withdrawn
Source reference: p.3With regard to the remaining applicants, the respondents were directed to release the remaining payments along with interest on the delayed payment of retiral dues, as per the direction given in *Rajbir Singh (Supra)*, by passing a reasoned and speaking order within eight weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of the order
Source reference: p.6-7The court clarified that it did not express any opinion regarding the merits of the case
Source reference: p.7No costs were awarded
Source reference: p.7Original Court PDF
SUNITAvsMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in