CAT - Delhi

Delayed retiral benefits attract compound interest at GPF rates from the due date until actual payment.

VIJAY SINGH vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

CAT - DelhiJUDGMENT: March 14, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, a retired Mali from the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), filed an Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985

Source reference: para. 1

He sought directions for the release of all pension-cum-retirement benefits, including gratuity, commuted pension, 7th CPC arrears, MACP scheme benefits, and various allowances, along with 12% compounded interest on delayed payments

Source reference: para. 1

The respondents filed an additional affidavit admitting that specific amounts—Rs. 20,964 for 3rd MACP arrears and Rs. 41,625 for 7th CPC arrears—remained unpaid

Source reference: para. 2

The respondents expressed readiness to release these amounts with interest in accordance with a Full Bench decision of the Tribunal, noting that the said decision is currently under challenge before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi

Source reference: para. 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the immediate release of unpaid retiral benefits and arrears

Source reference: para. 4

2. Whether the applicant is entitled to interest on the delayed payment of retiral dues, and if so, at what rate and frequency

Source reference: para. 4-5
03

Law Applied

The court primarily relied on the principles established by the Full Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal in Rajbir Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi Anr. (O.A. No. 2821/2023, decided on 30.10.2025), which held that interest on delayed payments of GPF, pension, and gratuity is payable at the relevant GPF rates

Source reference: para. 5

This precedent further established that such interest must be calculated on a compoundable basis for the period of delay

Source reference: para. 5
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal noted the respondents' admission regarding the outstanding arrears due to the applicant

Source reference: para. 2

Applying the ratio of the Full Bench decision in Rajbir Singh, the Tribunal reasoned that any delay in the disbursement of retiral dues attracts interest at the GPF rate to compensate the pensioner

Source reference: para. 5

Although the respondents pointed out that the Rajbir Singh judgment was being challenged in the Delhi High Court via W.P.(C) No. 19199/2025, the Tribunal determined that the applicant's dues should be settled in line with the current prevailing law, while making the payment of interest contingent upon the High Court's final decision

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The Tribunal disposed of the Original Application by directing the respondents to release all remaining retiral dues to the applicant within eight weeks

The court ordered that interest on the delayed payments be calculated at compoundable GPF rates from the due date until the actual date of release

Source reference: para. 6(i)

However, it explicitly held that the directions regarding the payment and rate of interest are subject to the outcome of W.P.(C) No. 19199/2025 pending before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi

Source reference: para. 6(ii)

No order as to costs was made

Source reference: para. 6(iv)
CAT - Delhi

Original Court PDF

VIJAY SINGHvsMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

CAT - Delhi · March 14, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment