Madras High Court
Social Security and PensionsEmployment and Labour Law

Delayed terminal benefits attract 6% annual interest from the employee’s death until payment.

K.Indira vs The Managing Director,

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: September 30, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Delayed terminal benefits attract 6% annual interest from the employee’s death until payment.. K.Indira vs The Managing Director,. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner’s husband, a Conductor employed by the respondent Transport Corporation from 20 December 1988, died in service on 4 January 2021.

Source reference: paras. 2, 4; pp. 2–3

His terminal benefits were paid to the petitioner on 6 December 2022. After representing for interest on the delayed payment, the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing payment of interest at 6% per annum from the date of death until actual disbursement.

Source reference: paras. 2, 4; pp. 2–3

The respondents reported that the benefits had been paid on 6 December 2022.

Source reference: paras. 2, 4; pp. 2–3
02

Issues

Whether the petitioner was entitled to interest on her deceased husband’s terminal benefits because they were paid belatedly.

Source reference: paras. 2–3, 7–9; pp. 2–6

If so, whether interest should be paid at 6% per annum from the date of death until actual disbursement.

Source reference: para. 9; p. 6
03

Law Applied

In S.K. Dua v. State of Haryana, (2008) 3 SCC 44, the Supreme Court recognised that an employee may claim interest on delayed retiral benefits under applicable statutory rules or administrative instructions, and that a claim may also be grounded in Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution even in their absence.

Source reference: para. 7; pp. 4–5

A Division Bench of the Madras High Court, in W.A.(MD) No. 403 of 2010 and connected matters, held that where the rules contemplate prompt payment of retirement benefits, the Corporation is obliged to compensate for delayed payment by interest, notwithstanding the absence of an express interest provision; it fixed the rate at 6% per annum.

Source reference: para. 8; pp. 5–6
04

Reasoning

The Court accepted that the terminal benefits were disbursed only on 6 December 2022, nearly twenty-three months after the employee’s death on 4 January 2021.

Source reference: paras. 2, 4; pp. 2–3

Applying S.K. Dua and the Division Bench decision, it held that terminal benefits should be settled without delay and that belated payment warrants interest, even where the applicable rules do not expressly provide for it.

Source reference: paras. 7–9; pp. 4–6

It therefore applied the 6% rate established by the Division Bench and calculated the interest period from the date of death to actual disbursement.

Source reference: para. 9; p. 6
05

Holding

The Court disposed of the writ petition and directed the respondents to pay interest at 6% per annum on the eligible terminal benefits disbursed belatedly, from 4 January 2021, the date of the employee’s death, until the date of actual disbursement.

Payment was ordered within six months from receipt of a copy of the order; there was no order as to costs.

Source reference: para. 9; p. 6
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

K.IndiravsThe Managing Director,

Madras High Court · September 30, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment