Delhi High CourtAdministrative and Public LawHuman Rights Law

Delhi HC Gives MCD A Week To Identify A Vending Site Outside Kamla Nagar’s No-Vending Zone For Street Vendor

Dinesh Sahuv.Municipal Corporation Of Delhi And Ors.

Delhi HC Gives MCD A Week To Identify A Vending Site Outside Kamla Nagar’s No-Vending Zone For Street Vendor. Dinesh Sahu vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi And Ors.. Delhi High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the petitioner could be permitted to vend in Kamla Nagar despite the area being a “No Vending” and “Non-Squatting” zone

The court held

The petition was disposed of.

It also directed

The MCD’s concerned Assistant Commissioner was directed to identify and communicate a vending area to the petitioner within one week.

The petitioner was directed not to enter the No-Vending area or obstruct pedestrians, to maintain cleanliness and provide a dustbin, and not to erect any structure.

These directions were made subject to any plan prepared by Town Vending Committee-II under Section 21 of the 2014 Act, and conferred no vested rights.

The petitioner was not to be disturbed while vending in accordance with the directions.

Town Vending Committee-II was directed to decide the category-change representation within three months of its constitution.

01Facts

The petitioner, a street vendor, held a provisional Certificate of Vending (CoV) issued by the MCD in the “Others” category for Keshav Puram Zone, Ward 78N.

pp. 1–3

He sought permission to vend near 9 F, Kamla Nagar, and said he was being prevented from vending there despite holding the CoV.

pp. 1–3

He had also represented to the MCD on 19 October 2026 seeking a change of category to “Food snack with Gas Cylinder/Fire”.

pp. 1–3

The Court noted that Kamla Nagar was a “No Vending” and “Non-Squatting” zone, and considered its directions in Anil Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors., W.P.(C) 7593/2026.

p. 4

02Issues

i.1. Whether the petitioner could be permitted to vend in Kamla Nagar despite the area being a “No Vending” and “Non-Squatting” zone

p. 4

ii.2. Whether the petitioner’s request to change his CoV category should be considered, and by whom

pp. 2–3, 5

03Law Applied

The Court referred to the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, particularly Section 21, under which the Town Vending Committee may formulate a plan governing vending.

p. 5

It also required compliance with the CoV’s terms and conditions, including adherence to the vending zone and period, maintaining hygiene, avoiding obstruction to pedestrian and vehicular movement, and not erecting permanent or temporary structures.

pp. 3–4

The Court also relied on its directions in Anil Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors., W.P.(C) 7593/2026, concerning vending in the relevant area.

p. 4

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 Section 21

04Reasoning

Because Kamla Nagar was a “No Vending” and “Non-Squatting” zone, the petitioner could not claim a right to vend there merely by relying on his CoV.

pp. 4–5

Applying the approach in Anil Kumar, the Court directed the MCD to identify another area for the petitioner, while requiring him to remain within that area, avoid obstruction, maintain cleanliness, and refrain from construction.

pp. 4–5

The proposed change to his CoV category was a separate matter for the Town Vending Committee-II to consider once constituted.

p. 5

05Holding

The petition was disposed of.

pp. 4–5

The MCD’s concerned Assistant Commissioner was directed to identify and communicate a vending area to the petitioner within one week.

pp. 4–5

The petitioner was directed not to enter the No-Vending area or obstruct pedestrians, to maintain cleanliness and provide a dustbin, and not to erect any structure.

pp. 4–5

These directions were made subject to any plan prepared by Town Vending Committee-II under Section 21 of the 2014 Act, and conferred no vested rights.

pp. 4–5

The petitioner was not to be disturbed while vending in accordance with the directions.

pp. 4–5

Town Vending Committee-II was directed to decide the category-change representation within three months of its constitution.

pp. 4–5
Delhi High Court

Original Court PDF

Dinesh SahuvsMunicipal Corporation Of Delhi And Ors.

Delhi High Court · November 06, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment