01Facts
The petitioner, a street vendor, held a provisional Certificate of Vending (CoV) issued by the MCD in the “Others” category for Keshav Puram Zone, Ward 78N.
pp. 1–3He sought permission to vend near 9 F, Kamla Nagar, and said he was being prevented from vending there despite holding the CoV.
pp. 1–3He had also represented to the MCD on 19 October 2026 seeking a change of category to “Food snack with Gas Cylinder/Fire”.
pp. 1–3The Court noted that Kamla Nagar was a “No Vending” and “Non-Squatting” zone, and considered its directions in Anil Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors., W.P.(C) 7593/2026.
p. 402Issues
i.1. Whether the petitioner could be permitted to vend in Kamla Nagar despite the area being a “No Vending” and “Non-Squatting” zone
p. 4ii.2. Whether the petitioner’s request to change his CoV category should be considered, and by whom
pp. 2–3, 503Law Applied
The Court referred to the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, particularly Section 21, under which the Town Vending Committee may formulate a plan governing vending.
p. 5It also required compliance with the CoV’s terms and conditions, including adherence to the vending zone and period, maintaining hygiene, avoiding obstruction to pedestrian and vehicular movement, and not erecting permanent or temporary structures.
pp. 3–4The Court also relied on its directions in Anil Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors., W.P.(C) 7593/2026, concerning vending in the relevant area.
p. 4Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 Section 21
04Reasoning
Because Kamla Nagar was a “No Vending” and “Non-Squatting” zone, the petitioner could not claim a right to vend there merely by relying on his CoV.
pp. 4–5Applying the approach in Anil Kumar, the Court directed the MCD to identify another area for the petitioner, while requiring him to remain within that area, avoid obstruction, maintain cleanliness, and refrain from construction.
pp. 4–5The proposed change to his CoV category was a separate matter for the Town Vending Committee-II to consider once constituted.
p. 505Holding
The petition was disposed of.
pp. 4–5The MCD’s concerned Assistant Commissioner was directed to identify and communicate a vending area to the petitioner within one week.
pp. 4–5The petitioner was directed not to enter the No-Vending area or obstruct pedestrians, to maintain cleanliness and provide a dustbin, and not to erect any structure.
pp. 4–5These directions were made subject to any plan prepared by Town Vending Committee-II under Section 21 of the 2014 Act, and conferred no vested rights.
pp. 4–5The petitioner was not to be disturbed while vending in accordance with the directions.
pp. 4–5Town Vending Committee-II was directed to decide the category-change representation within three months of its constitution.
pp. 4–5Original Court PDF
Dinesh SahuvsMunicipal Corporation Of Delhi And Ors.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
