01Facts
The Petitioners applied under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking an opportunity to be heard by the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) before finalisation of the vending plan.
p. 1 · ¶ 2An earlier order had directed that representatives of shopkeepers and vendors be heard by the competent authority while the Town Vending Plan and applicable norms were being considered.
pp. 2–3 · ¶ 4The Chief Secretary subsequently informed the Court that the plan had been returned to NDMC with concerns.
p. 3 · ¶ 6The Court noted that NDMC had substantially completed its survey of old Tehbazari holders and that the Delhi Traffic Police had provided comments.
p. 4 · ¶ 11(i)–(ii)02Issues
i.Whether the Petitioners and other affected stakeholders should be given a further opportunity to be heard before the vending plan is finalised.
p. 1 · ¶ 2 · p. 4 · ¶ 11(iv)–(v)ii.Whether NDMC or the Delhi Government is responsible for finalising and approving the vending plan under Section 21 of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014.
p. 3 · ¶ 7–8 · p. 4 · ¶ 11(iii), (vi)–(vii)03Law Applied
Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was invoked as the procedural basis for the Petitioners’ application.
p. 1 · ¶ 2Under Section 21 of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, the Delhi Government is responsible for the final decision on the vending plan and applicable norms; NDMC, as the local authority, prepares and submits the plan and may make changes to it before submission.
p. 3 · ¶ 7–8 · p. 4 · ¶ 11(iii), (vi)–(vii)The Court also relied on its earlier directions requiring stakeholder representations to be heard before a decision was taken.
pp. 2–3 · ¶ 4Provisions in the judgment · 2 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 151
Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 Section 21
04Reasoning
The Court considered that the earlier opportunity to make submissions had not resolved the issue: the plan had been returned to NDMC, while the Delhi Government’s stated position was that the local authority should address stakeholders’ comments and objections.
pp. 3–4 · ¶ 6, 9–10Given NDMC’s role in preparing the plan and the Government’s ultimate statutory responsibility for approving it, the Court directed a sequenced process: NDMC was to complete the plan, stakeholders were to be heard jointly by NDMC and the Joint Secretary, and NDMC was to incorporate any resulting changes before submitting the plan to the Government.
p. 4 · ¶ 11(iii)–(vii)05Holding
The application was disposed of with directions that NDMC finalise the vending plan for its entire area by 26 November 2026; that vendors, traders, and shopkeepers be heard on 8 December 2026; and that any required changes be made and the plan submitted to the Delhi Government.
p. 4 · ¶ 11(iii)–(vi)The Delhi Government was then to decide the plan and applicable norms under Section 21, with the Chief Secretary ensuring early consideration and approval.
pp. 4–5 · ¶ 11(vii), 13The order records the submission deadline as 10 January 2026, which predates the specified hearing date of 8 December 2026 and appears to be a date inconsistency in the text.
p. 4 · ¶ 11(vi)The writ petition was listed for 26 November 2026.
p. 5 · ¶ 15Original Court PDF
Palika Bazar Shopkeepers Welfare Association And OrsvsGovt. Of Nct Of Delhi
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
