Delhi High CourtArbitration and MediationAdministrative and Public Law

Delhi HC Sets Jan 31 Deadline To Decide Balcony Repair Dispute After Co-op Society Member Says He Cannot Use Flat

Sudipa Roy & Anr.v.Registrar Of Co Operative Society & Anr.

Delhi HC Sets Jan 31 Deadline To Decide Balcony Repair Dispute After Co-op Society Member Says He Cannot Use Flat. Sudipa Roy & Anr. vs Registrar Of Co Operative Society & Anr.. Delhi High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the Tribunal’s order referring the dispute to arbitration and defining its scope warranted interference under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The court held

The Court declined to interfere with the Tribunal’s order.

It also directed

It directed the Registrar to appoint an arbitrator by 10 November 2026 and directed the arbitrator, after issuing notice to and hearing the Society, to consider the petitioner’s claims, including any interim-relief application, and dispose of the matter by 31 January 2027.

The petition and pending applications were disposed of accordingly.

01Facts

The petitioners, members of Nav Sansad Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd., disputed responsibility for repairs to the balconies of their flat, No. 461. They and other claimants sought reference of the dispute to arbitration under Section 70 of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 (“DCS Act”); the Registrar dismissed their claim as not maintainable.

pp. 1–3 · ¶ 3–8

On appeal, the Delhi Co-operative Tribunal set aside that decision, held that an arbitrable dispute existed, directed the Registrar to appoint an arbitrator, and defined the dispute to include responsibility for reconstruction and maintenance of the balcony.

pp. 3–4 · ¶ 9

The petitioners then sought relief from the High Court, citing delay in resolving the dispute and their inability to use the flat, including a Society notice restricting its use.

pp. 4–6 · ¶ 12–16

02Issues

i.Whether the Tribunal’s order referring the dispute to arbitration and defining its scope warranted interference under Article 226 of the Constitution.

p. 6 · ¶ 16–17

ii.Whether directions were required to ensure timely appointment of the arbitrator and disposal of the dispute, including consideration of interim relief.

p. 6 · ¶ 16–19

03Law Applied

Article 226 of the Constitution provides the High Court’s jurisdiction to review the challenged Tribunal order; the Court found no ground to interfere with that order.

p. 6 · ¶ 2, 17

Section 70 of the DCS Act was the statutory basis invoked for referring the dispute to arbitration.

pp. 1–2 · ¶ 6

The Tribunal treated a dispute between a Society and its member concerning responsibility for balcony repairs and maintenance as arbitrable and directed that the arbitrator determine the parties’ respective obligations.

pp. 3–4 · ¶ 9

Provisions in the judgment · 3

Delhi Co-Operative Societies Act, 2003 Section 70Section 37Section 118

04Reasoning

The High Court considered that the Tribunal had found a dispute between the petitioner and the Society and had referred the question of responsibility for reconstruction and maintenance to arbitration.

p. 6 · ¶ 16–17

It held that the Tribunal’s order was reasonable and did not warrant interference.

p. 6 · ¶ 16–17

However, given the petitioner’s inability to use the flat and the delay in resolving the dispute, the Court directed an expedited appointment and determination, while leaving the merits and any request for interim relief to the arbitrator.

p. 6 · ¶ 16–19

05Holding

The Court declined to interfere with the Tribunal’s order.

p. 6 · ¶ 17

It directed the Registrar to appoint an arbitrator by 10 November 2026 and directed the arbitrator, after issuing notice to and hearing the Society, to consider the petitioner’s claims, including any interim-relief application, and dispose of the matter by 31 January 2027.

p. 6 · ¶ 17–20

The petition and pending applications were disposed of accordingly.

p. 6 · ¶ 20
Delhi High Court

Original Court PDF

Sudipa Roy & Anr.vsRegistrar Of Co Operative Society & Anr.

Delhi High Court · October 30, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment