Facts
The applicant was arrested on 18.12.2025 in connection with Crime No. 136/2025 following a raid by the Excise Circle Baikunthpur, which resulted in the seizure of 18 bulk liters of Mahua liquor from his possession
Source reference: para. 1-2He was charged under Sections 34(1)(A), 34(2), and 59(A) of the C.G. Excise Act
Source reference: para. 1The applicant moved the High Court seeking regular bail, contending that he had been falsely implicated, that the maximum punishment for the offense is three years, and that the charge-sheet has already been filed
Source reference: para. 3The State opposed the bail, citing the applicant's one criminal antecedent of a similar nature from 2023, labeling him a habitual offender
Source reference: para. 4Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, considering the nature of the offense and his criminal history
Source reference: para. 1, 6Law Applied
Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the power of the High Court to grant bail
Source reference: para. 1Sections 34(1)(A), 34(2), and 59(A) of the C.G. Excise Act regarding the unlawful possession of spirits
Source reference: para. 2Procedural safeguards and penalties for non-compliance under Sections 209 and 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 84 of the BNSS
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The Court weighed the gravity of the allegations and the quantity of the seized liquor (18 bulk liters) against the duration of the applicant's pretrial detention since 18.12.2025
Source reference: para. 6While acknowledging the State's concern regarding the applicant’s criminal antecedent from 2023, the Court noted that the charge-sheet had already been filed and that the trial was unlikely to conclude in the near future
Source reference: para. 6By balancing the right to liberty with the necessity of ensuring the applicant's presence at trial, the Court determined that bail was appropriate, provided it was coupled with stringent conditions to prevent the abuse of liberty and ensure procedural compliance
Source reference: para. 7Holding
The High Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on a personal bond with two sureties
The Court held that despite the applicant's antecedent, the circumstances and the stage of the trial justified bail
Source reference: para. 6The release is subject to specific conditions: the applicant must not seek unnecessary adjournments, must appear on all trial dates, and must strictly comply with Sections 209 and 269 of the BNS to avoid cancellation of bail
Source reference: para. 7Original Court PDF
SHIVMANGAL TIRKIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in