Chhattisgarh High Court

Detention duration and charge-sheet filing justify bail in excise offences notwithstanding a single criminal antecedent.

SHIVMANGAL TIRKI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: March 16, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant was arrested on 18.12.2025 in connection with Crime No. 136/2025 following a raid by the Excise Circle Baikunthpur, which resulted in the seizure of 18 bulk liters of Mahua liquor from his possession

Source reference: para. 1-2

He was charged under Sections 34(1)(A), 34(2), and 59(A) of the C.G. Excise Act

Source reference: para. 1

The applicant moved the High Court seeking regular bail, contending that he had been falsely implicated, that the maximum punishment for the offense is three years, and that the charge-sheet has already been filed

Source reference: para. 3

The State opposed the bail, citing the applicant's one criminal antecedent of a similar nature from 2023, labeling him a habitual offender

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, considering the nature of the offense and his criminal history

Source reference: para. 1, 6
03

Law Applied

Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the power of the High Court to grant bail

Source reference: para. 1

Sections 34(1)(A), 34(2), and 59(A) of the C.G. Excise Act regarding the unlawful possession of spirits

Source reference: para. 2

Procedural safeguards and penalties for non-compliance under Sections 209 and 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 84 of the BNSS

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The Court weighed the gravity of the allegations and the quantity of the seized liquor (18 bulk liters) against the duration of the applicant's pretrial detention since 18.12.2025

Source reference: para. 6

While acknowledging the State's concern regarding the applicant’s criminal antecedent from 2023, the Court noted that the charge-sheet had already been filed and that the trial was unlikely to conclude in the near future

Source reference: para. 6

By balancing the right to liberty with the necessity of ensuring the applicant's presence at trial, the Court determined that bail was appropriate, provided it was coupled with stringent conditions to prevent the abuse of liberty and ensure procedural compliance

Source reference: para. 7
05

Holding

The High Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on a personal bond with two sureties

The Court held that despite the applicant's antecedent, the circumstances and the stage of the trial justified bail

Source reference: para. 6

The release is subject to specific conditions: the applicant must not seek unnecessary adjournments, must appear on all trial dates, and must strictly comply with Sections 209 and 269 of the BNS to avoid cancellation of bail

Source reference: para. 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SHIVMANGAL TIRKIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · March 16, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment