CAT - ['Delhi']

Dismissal of Original Application for Default and Non-Prosecution Due to Persistent Absence of Applicant’s Counsel

Amit Sharma vs M/o Railways

CAT - ['Delhi']JUDGMENT: May 06, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The Original Application (OA) was filed by Amit Sharma and 33 other applicants, all serving as Loco Pilots (Goods) in Group-C under the Divisional Railway Manager, Northern Railway, Moradabad.

Source reference: p.1-6

The applicants sought relief against the Secretary of the Railway Board, the General Manager of Northern Railway, and several private respondents.

Source reference: p.7

The procedural history indicated that the matter had been adjourned on various previous occasions, and the applicants' counsel had consistently sought adjournments rather than proceeding with effective hearings.

Source reference: p.8, para. 1
02

Issues

1. Whether the Original Application (OA) is liable to be dismissed due to the continuous absence of the applicants and their failure to prosecute the case.

Source reference: p.8, para. 2-3
03

Law Applied

The Court applied the principle of "Dismissal in Default and for Non-Prosecution."

Source reference: p.8, para. 3

This principle empowers an adjudicating body to dismiss a case when the petitioner or applicant fails to appear or show interest in pursuing the litigation, ensuring that the judicial process is not stalled by inactive parties.

Source reference: p.8, para. 3
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal observed from the earlier order sheets that the case had been repeatedly adjourned on various pretexts.

Source reference: p.8, para. 1

The Bench noted that even when the matter was listed for effective hearing, the applicants' proxy counsel merely sought further adjournments. On the day of the final hearing, no representative appeared for the applicants.

Source reference: p.8, para. 1

The Court reasoned that this consistent behavior indicated that the applicants were no longer interested in pursuing the relief sought in the OA.

Source reference: p.8, para. 2
05

Holding

The Tribunal answered the issue in the affirmative and dismissed the OA in default and for non-prosecution.

The pending Miscellaneous Application (MA) was also disposed of accordingly. The Court ordered that there shall be no orders as to costs.

Source reference: p.8, para. 3
CAT - ['Delhi']

Original Court PDF

Amit SharmavsM/o Railways

CAT - ['Delhi'] · May 06, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment