Karnataka High Court
Family LawCriminal Law

Domestic violence proceedings may be quashed after a voluntary, fully performed matrimonial settlement.

SRI POOJITH A vs SMT ASHWINI MG

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 25, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Domestic violence proceedings may be quashed after a voluntary, fully performed matrimonial settlement.. SRI POOJITH A vs SMT ASHWINI MG. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioners sought to quash the respondent’s proceedings under Sections 12, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, pending before the JMFC (Traffic Court–5), Bengaluru

Source reference: p. 2–3

The dispute arose from the parties’ marriage; the first petitioner and respondent had also pursued divorce proceedings, which were referred to mediation.

Source reference: p. 3–6

Under their settlement, the first petitioner agreed to pay the respondent ₹10,00,000 as full and final alimony, and the respondent agreed to withdraw the domestic-violence proceedings

Source reference: p. 3–6

The joint affidavit stated that the full amount had been paid, the marriage had been dissolved by decree, and the respondent voluntarily consented to quashing the pending proceedings

Source reference: p. 9–11
02

Issues

1. Whether the pending proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act should be quashed in light of the parties’ settlement and the respondent’s consent

Source reference: p. 11–12

2. Whether the criminal petition should be disposed of on the basis of that settlement.

Source reference: p. 11
03

Law Applied

The petition invoked the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (and was described as having been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure)

Source reference: p. 2, 10

The proceedings sought to be quashed arose under Sections 12, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005

Source reference: p. 2–3, 12

The Court also noted the parties’ mediated settlement under Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, read with Rule 24 of the Karnataka Civil Procedure (Mediation) Rules, 2005.

Source reference: p. 3

The order cites no precedent and sets out no further general test for quashing on settlement.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The Court considered the mediated settlement, the joint affidavit, the respondent’s express consent, payment of the agreed alimony, and the decree dissolving the marriage.

Source reference: p. 3–11

In view of those circumstances, it disposed of the petition on the basis of the settlement and quashed the Domestic Violence Act proceedings insofar as they concerned the petitioners.

Source reference: p. 11–12
05

Holding

The Court disposed of the criminal petition in view of the settlement and joint affidavit, and quashed the proceedings in Crl. Misc. No. 12/2025 under Sections 12, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 22 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, insofar as the petitioners were concerned
06

Acts & Sections Cited

16 provisions across 7 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 20056

Code of Civil Procedure, 19081

Hindu Marriage Act, 19551

Dowry Prohibition Act, 19612

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI POOJITH AvsSMT ASHWINI MG

Karnataka High Court · September 25, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment