Chhattisgarh High Court

Each claimant is entitled to separate compensation for loss of consortium in motor accident death claims.

SMT. JAYKANTI SAGAR vs TRILOCHAN PATEL

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 25, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The appellants (claimants), being the wife, three minor children, and parents of the deceased Balram Sagar, filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Source reference: p. 3

They sought enhancement of the compensation awarded by the 2nd Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Jagdalpur, in Claim Case No. 18/18 dated 14/12/2018

Source reference: p. 3

The Tribunal had awarded a total compensation of Rs. 15,68,770/-, but granted only Rs. 40,000/- for loss of consortium to a single claimant despite there being six dependents

Source reference: p. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the Claims Tribunal erred in awarding loss of consortium to only one claimant instead of all six legal dependents of the deceased

Source reference: p. 3 / para. 2

2. Whether the appellants are entitled to an enhancement of the total compensation amount based on the principle of individual consortium

Source reference: p. 4 / para. 5
03

Law Applied

The Court applied Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which governs appeals against awards of Claims Tribunals

Source reference: p. 3

"consortium" is a compendious term encompassing spousal, parental, and filial consortium, and each legal dependent is entitled to a separate award under this head

Source reference: p. 4 / para. 5
04

Reasoning

The Court reviewed the Tribunal's award and observed that only Rs. 40,000/- was granted for loss of consortium

Source reference: p. 4

There are six claimants in total: the widow, three minor children, and two parents

Source reference: p. 1-2

The Court reasoned that since there are six claimants, each is entitled to Rs. 40,000/- for loss of consortium

Source reference: p. 4

Consequently, the Court calculated that an additional amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rs. 40,000 x 5 remaining claimants) ought to be added to the original award to ensure just compensation

Source reference: p. 4 / para. 5-6
05

Holding

The Court answered the issue in the affirmative, holding that the Tribunal failed to award consortium to each claimant

The total compensation was enhanced from Rs. 15,68,770/- to Rs. 17,68,770/-

Source reference: p. 4

The Court directed Respondent No. 3 (Oriental Insurance Company) to deposit the additional Rs. 2,00,000/- within three months, carrying interest at 9% per annum from the date of the claim application (08/01/2018) until realization

Source reference: p. 4

The appeal was allowed, and the impugned award was modified accordingly

Source reference: p. 5
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SMT. JAYKANTI SAGARvsTRILOCHAN PATEL

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 25, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment