01Facts
The appellants—deceased Mohammed Dadapeer’s wife, two minor children and mother—sought compensation for his death in a road accident on 8 May 2023 involving a tipper lorry.
p. 3The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded ₹24,83,500, including ₹23,62,500 for loss of dependency, and applied 6% annual interest.
pp. 4–5The claimants appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.
p. 202Issues
i.1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of loss of dependency should be enhanced by revising the deceased’s age, income and future-prospects calculation.
pp. 5–6ii.2. Whether the amounts awarded for consortium, funeral expenses and loss of estate should be enhanced.
pp. 6–703Law Applied
Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for an appeal against an award of the Claims Tribunal.
p. 2In assessing dependency compensation, the Court considered the deceased’s age, applicable multiplier, income, future prospects and deduction for personal expenses.
pp. 5–6Applying National Insurance Co. v. Pranay Sethi, AIR 2017 SC 5157, the Court applied 40% future prospects and 20% escalation to conventional heads, as the accident occurred more than six years after that decision.
pp. 5–7Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173
04Reasoning
The Court took the deceased’s age as 38, based on the Aadhaar card, and applied a multiplier of 15. It assessed his monthly income at ₹16,250, added 40% for future prospects, and retained the Tribunal’s one-third deduction for personal expenses, producing loss of dependency of ₹30,71,250.
pp. 5–6It awarded consortium of ₹48,000 to each of the four claimants and increased funeral expenses and loss of estate to ₹18,000 each, applying 20% escalation to those conventional heads.
pp. 6–705Holding
The appeal was allowed in part. The Court enhanced the total compensation to ₹32,99,250, an increase of ₹8,15,750 over the Tribunal’s award, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.
p. 7The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with interest within six weeks; the claimants were given equal shares, with the minors’ shares to remain in fixed deposits until they attain majority.
p. 8Original Court PDF
SHAHEENA BANUvsKUNTADEVI
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
