Karnataka High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Each dependent is entitled to consortium with the applicable 20% escalation.

SHAHEENA BANUv.KUNTADEVI

Each dependent is entitled to consortium with the applicable 20% escalation.. SHAHEENA BANU vs KUNTADEVI. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of loss of dependency should be enhanced by revising the deceased’s age, income and future-prospects calculation.

The court held

The appeal was allowed in part. The Court enhanced the total compensation to ₹32,99,250, an increase of ₹8,15,750 over the Tribunal’s award, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.

It also directed

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with interest within six weeks; the claimants were given equal shares, with the minors’ shares to remain in fixed deposits until they attain majority.

01Facts

The appellants—deceased Mohammed Dadapeer’s wife, two minor children and mother—sought compensation for his death in a road accident on 8 May 2023 involving a tipper lorry.

p. 3

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded ₹24,83,500, including ₹23,62,500 for loss of dependency, and applied 6% annual interest.

pp. 4–5

The claimants appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.

p. 2

02Issues

i.1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of loss of dependency should be enhanced by revising the deceased’s age, income and future-prospects calculation.

pp. 5–6

ii.2. Whether the amounts awarded for consortium, funeral expenses and loss of estate should be enhanced.

pp. 6–7

03Law Applied

Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for an appeal against an award of the Claims Tribunal.

p. 2

In assessing dependency compensation, the Court considered the deceased’s age, applicable multiplier, income, future prospects and deduction for personal expenses.

pp. 5–6

Applying National Insurance Co. v. Pranay Sethi, AIR 2017 SC 5157, the Court applied 40% future prospects and 20% escalation to conventional heads, as the accident occurred more than six years after that decision.

pp. 5–7

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

04Reasoning

The Court took the deceased’s age as 38, based on the Aadhaar card, and applied a multiplier of 15. It assessed his monthly income at ₹16,250, added 40% for future prospects, and retained the Tribunal’s one-third deduction for personal expenses, producing loss of dependency of ₹30,71,250.

pp. 5–6

It awarded consortium of ₹48,000 to each of the four claimants and increased funeral expenses and loss of estate to ₹18,000 each, applying 20% escalation to those conventional heads.

pp. 6–7

05Holding

The appeal was allowed in part. The Court enhanced the total compensation to ₹32,99,250, an increase of ₹8,15,750 over the Tribunal’s award, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.

p. 7

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with interest within six weeks; the claimants were given equal shares, with the minors’ shares to remain in fixed deposits until they attain majority.

p. 8
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SHAHEENA BANUvsKUNTADEVI

Karnataka High Court · October 13, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment