Karnataka High Court
Property and Real Estate LawAdministrative and Public Law

Eligible 2016–2018 site allottees may cure payment defaults by paying the balance with 12% interest.

SMT. R. SHWETHA vs THE COMMISSIONER

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: July 31, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Eligible 2016–2018 site allottees may cure payment defaults by paying the balance with 12% interest.. SMT. R. SHWETHA vs THE COMMISSIONER. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner’s late husband was allotted Site No. B5-SH-2510 in Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout on 19 December 2016, subject to payment of the balance sital value of ₹4,57,626.

Source reference: p. 2

He did not pay the balance; the petitioner stated that the allotment letter and subsequent steps had not been communicated to him.

Source reference: p. 2

After his death, she sought transfer of the allotment and permission to pay the balance.

Source reference: p. 2

Following an earlier writ petition directing the BDA to consider her representations, the BDA cancelled the allotment on 15 May 2023 for non-payment.

Source reference: p. 2–4

The petitioner challenged that cancellation and sought restoration of the allotment.

Source reference: p. 2–4

During the present proceedings, the parties acknowledged the State Government’s order dated 15 March 2024 permitting specified allottees in the 2016 and 2018 allotment years to pay the outstanding balance with 12% annual interest.

Source reference: p. 5–6
02

Issues

1. Whether the BDA’s cancellation of the allotment for non-payment should be set aside in light of the State Government’s order dated 15 March 2024.

Source reference: p. 4–6

2. Whether the petitioner, as the allottee’s legal heir, was entitled to restoration of the allotment and an opportunity to pay the balance sital value with interest and obtain conveyance.

Source reference: p. 2, 5–7
03

Law Applied

The Court applied the State Government’s order dated 15 March 2024, which permitted payment of the balance sital value with interest at 12% per annum by qualifying allottees of sites in Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout allotted in 2016 and 2018.

Source reference: p. 5–6

The judgment also referred to the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1984, particularly in relation to payment of delayed amounts, but did not identify a specific rule or statutory provision.

Source reference: p. 5

No judicial precedent was cited.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The petitioner’s husband’s allotment was made in 2016, bringing it within the category covered by the State Government’s order.

Source reference: p. 6

The respondents did not dispute that the order permitted the relevant allottees to pay the outstanding sital value with 12% annual interest.

Source reference: p. 6

The Court therefore held that the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of that order, and that the non-payment basis for cancellation did not prevent restoration on the terms now available under it.

Source reference: p. 6–7
05

Holding

The petition was allowed and the cancellation order dated 15 May 2023 was quashed.

The BDA was directed to restore the allotment, issue an allotment letter in the petitioner’s name, and accept the balance sital value with 12% annual interest from the date it became due until payment.

Source reference: p. 6–7

The petitioner must pay within two weeks of the demand notice.

Source reference: p. 6–7

Upon receipt of payment, the BDA must execute an absolute sale deed in her favour; the site must not be allotted to anyone else pending completion.

Source reference: p. 6–7

The directions are to be completed within three months after payment.

Source reference: p. 6–7
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SMT. R. SHWETHAvsTHE COMMISSIONER

Karnataka High Court · July 31, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment