Gauhati High Court
Employment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Eligible employees have a right to fair consideration for promotion, not promotion itself.

Indra Mohan Sarmah vs The State Of Assam And Anr

Gauhati High CourtJUDGMENT: October 06, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Eligible employees have a right to fair consideration for promotion, not promotion itself.. Indra Mohan Sarmah vs The State Of Assam And Anr. Gauhati High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner, an Assistant Engineer with the Assam Urban Water Supply and Sewerage Board, claimed eligibility for promotion to Assistant Executive Engineer after completing the five-year qualifying service prescribed under the rules adopted by the Board

Source reference: p.3

He had held charge of the higher post intermittently from 2008 to 2014 and, from 2016, on an almost permanent basis without additional financial benefit

Source reference: pp.3–4, para. 8

Although a DPC had been scheduled and later held, no promotion recommendation had been made; the Board stated that the promotion process remained under active consideration

Source reference: pp.3–4, paras. 2, 5

The petitioner sought consideration for promotion and consequential relief under Article 226 of the Constitution

Source reference: p.2
02

Issues

1. Whether the petitioner, having completed the qualifying service in the feeder cadre, was entitled to fair consideration for promotion to Assistant Executive Engineer

Source reference: p.5, para. 8

2. Whether the Court should direct the Board to convene a DPC and consider the petitioner’s case for promotion against available vacancies

Source reference: p.5, paras. 9–10
03

Law Applied

Promotion is not an indefeasible right, but an employee has a right to fair consideration for promotion

Source reference: p.5, para. 8

Under the rules adopted by the Board, five years’ service in the Assistant Engineer cadre is the qualifying period for consideration for promotion to Assistant Executive Engineer

Source reference: p.3

The Court exercised its jurisdiction under Article 226 to direct consideration in accordance with law; it did not identify or apply any precedent

Source reference: p.2; p.5, para. 10
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the petitioner had completed the five-year qualifying service and was therefore eligible to be considered for promotion

Source reference: p.5, para. 8

His history of holding charge of the higher post was also noted, but the Court did not treat that arrangement as conferring an entitlement to promotion

Source reference: p.5, paras. 8–9

Given the Board’s confirmation that the promotion process was under consideration, the Court directed an expeditious DPC process for the petitioner and other eligible candidates rather than ordering the petitioner’s promotion outright

Source reference: pp.4–5, paras. 5, 9–10
05

Holding

The Court disposed of the petition and directed the Board’s Managing Director to take expeditious steps to convene a DPC and consider the petitioner, along with other aspiring candidates, for vacancies in the Assistant Executive Engineer cadre in accordance with law.

The exercise was to be completed within three months of receipt of a certified copy of the order

Source reference: p.5, para. 10

The petition was allowed in those terms

Source reference: p.5, para. 11
Gauhati High Court

Original Court PDF

Indra Mohan SarmahvsThe State Of Assam And Anr

Gauhati High Court · October 06, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment