Facts
The appellant, a Secondary Grade Teacher, was eligible for promotion to Primary School Headmaster. Her name was included in the 2018 promotion panel (crucial date 01.01.2018)
Source reference: para. 3On 20.06.2018, she submitted a letter temporarily relinquishing her right to promotion for three years
Source reference: para. 3This relinquishment period expired on 16.06.2021
Source reference: para. 3For the subsequent promotion panel of 2021, the crucial date for eligibility was 01.01.2021. Because the appellant was still under the relinquishment period on the crucial date (01.01.2021), the respondents excluded her from the 2021 panel
Source reference: para. 3The appellant challenged this exclusion via a Writ Petition, which was dismissed on 25.03.2025. She then filed this intra-Court appeal.
Source reference: para. 1, 5Issues
Whether the appellant is eligible for promotion to the post of Primary School Headmaster on par with her juniors based on the 2021 panel, despite her temporary relinquishment
Source reference: para. 2Law Applied
The court applied the principle that while inclusion in a promotion panel is not an absolute right, consideration for promotion is a fundamental right of an employee.
Source reference: para. 6This right is subject to prevailing promotion rules and the employee's own exercise of the right to relinquish promotion. Once an employee chooses to relinquish promotion for a specific term, they forfeit the right to be considered for any panel where the "crucial date" for preparation falls within that relinquished period
Source reference: para. 6, 7Reasoning
The Court noted that the appellant voluntarily relinquished her promotion for three years starting June 2018, being fully aware of the procedural implications regarding "crucial dates" for panel preparation.
Source reference: para. 3The court reasoned that since the crucial date for the 2021 promotion panel was 01.01.2021, and the appellant's relinquishment period did not expire until 16.06.2021, she was legally ineligible to be included in that specific panel. The respondents' decision to exclude her was not an administrative error but a direct consequence of the appellant's own relinquishment letter.
Source reference: para. 3, 7The Court concurred with the Single Judge's findings that the expiry of the relinquishment period must occur before the crucial date of the panel for the employee to regain eligibility.
Source reference: para. 3, 5Holding
The Court answered the issue in the negative, holding that there was no infirmity in the respondents’ action or the Single Judge’s order.
The Writ Appeal was dismissed, confirming that the appellant became eligible for promotion only after 16.06.2021 and could not claim retrospective inclusion in a panel whose eligibility was determined on 01.01.2021. All connected miscellaneous petitions were closed with no costs.
Source reference: para. 3, 7Original Court PDF
P.AKILAvsThe Director of Elementary Education
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in