Madras High Court
Employment and Labour LawContract Law

Employees serving on the wage-revision eligibility date remain entitled to settlement benefits after retirement.

R.Murugan vs The Management of

Madras High CourtJUDGMENT: September 30, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Employees serving on the wage-revision eligibility date remain entitled to settlement benefits after retirement.. R.Murugan vs The Management of. Madras High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner, a Driver who was in service on 1 September 2023, retired as a Special Grade Driver on 31 January 2025.

Source reference: para. 1

A wage settlement under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, was entered into on 29 May 2025. It provided for a 6% pay revision notionally from 1 September 2023, with monetary benefits from 1 September 2024, payable in four quarterly instalments.

Source reference: paras. 1–3

The petitioner sought revision of his pay and consequential arrears and terminal benefits under the settlement.

Source reference: paras. 1–3

The respondent’s counsel stated that the Corporation would calculate any amount due and pay it within a reasonable time.

Source reference: paras. 1–3
02

Issues

Whether an employee who was in service on 1 September 2023, but retired before the settlement was concluded, was entitled to the settlement’s pay revision and monetary benefits.

Source reference: paras. 2, 5, 7

Whether delayed payment of the monetary benefits attracted interest, and, if so, at what rate and for what period.

Source reference: para. 8
03

Law Applied

Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, provides the statutory basis for the wage settlement at issue.

Source reference: para. 1

Under Clause 1 of the 29 May 2025 settlement, employees in service on 1 September 2023 were eligible for a 6% revision of pay, notionally effective from that date, with monetary benefits from 1 September 2024.

Source reference: para. 5

Clause 37(b) provided for arrears to be calculated from 1 September 2024 and paid in four quarterly instalments.

Source reference: para. 6

The Court further held that belated settlement of monetary benefits due to an employee warranted interest at 6% per annum.

Source reference: para. 8
04

Reasoning

The petitioner met the settlement’s eligibility condition because he was a permanent employee in service on 1 September 2023; his retirement before the settlement date did not defeat his entitlement.

Source reference: para. 7

The Court therefore held that his pay scale had to be revised from 1 September 2023 and that he was entitled to the resulting monetary benefits from 1 September 2024, consistent with the settlement.

Source reference: paras. 5, 7

As the revision had not been made, the Court directed payment with 6% annual interest for the period beyond that contemplated by Clause 37(b), continuing until actual payment.

Source reference: para. 8
05

Holding

The writ petition was allowed.

The respondent was directed to revise the petitioner’s pay scale with effect from 1 September 2023 and provide the benefits accruing from 1 September 2024 under the 15th wage settlement, within six months of receiving a copy of the order.

Source reference: para. 8

The amount was to carry interest at 6% per annum for the period beyond the payment schedule under Clause 37(b), until actual payment.

Source reference: para. 8

No costs were awarded.

Source reference: para. 8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Linked provisions open on LawLens.

Industrial Disputes Act, 19471

Section 12
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

R.MuruganvsThe Management of

Madras High Court · September 30, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment