Bombay High Court
Insurance LawCivil Law

Employer-proved salary slips can establish income for motor accident compensation without Form 16.

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited Through Its Mumbai Corporate Office vs Smt. Padama Brajesh Kumar Tripathi (Widow Of The Deceased) And Ors.

Bombay High CourtJUDGMENT: October 14, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Employer-proved salary slips can establish income for motor accident compensation without Form 16.. Reliance General Insurance Company Limited Through Its Mumbai Corporate Office vs Smt. Padama Brajesh Kumar Tripathi (Widow Of The Deceased) And Ors.. Bombay High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Brajesh Kumar Tripathi, aged 37, was killed when a trailer struck his motorcycle from behind on 23 February 2013. He was employed as a Junior Engineer and earned a monthly salary of Rs. 33,787

Source reference: paras. 2–3, pp. 2–3

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 41,61,960 with interest. The insurer appealed only on quantum, challenging the income assessment; the widow and children cross-objected, seeking future prospects and conventional heads of compensation

Source reference: paras. 2, 4–7, pp. 2–4
02

Issues

1. Whether the Tribunal was justified in assessing the deceased’s income on the basis of salary slips proved through the employer, rather than requiring Form 16

Source reference: paras. 5–6, p. 3

2. Whether the compensation should be enhanced by adding future prospects and amounts for consortium, loss of estate, and funeral expenses

Source reference: para. 7, p. 4
03

Law Applied

It applied the established method of calculating dependency compensation by determining the deceased’s income, adding future prospects, deducting the deceased’s personal expenses, and applying the appropriate multiplier.

Source reference: para. 7, p. 4

It also assessed compensation under conventional heads, including consortium, loss of estate, and funeral expenses

Source reference: para. 7, p. 4
04

Reasoning

The Court rejected the insurer’s challenge because the salary slips were proved through the employer’s representative, and the Tribunal had assessed income after deducting professional tax and income tax; the Court found no basis to require Form 16 instead

Source reference: paras. 5–6, p. 3

On the cross-objection, it added 50% for future prospects, deducted one-third for personal expenses, applied a multiplier of 15, and allowed amounts for funeral expenses, loss of estate, and consortium

Source reference: para. 7, p. 4

The judgment’s compensation table contains an apparent arithmetic inconsistency: the listed conventional heads added to the stated dependency figure exceed the stated total compensation

Source reference: para. 7, p. 4
05

Holding

The Court dismissed the insurer’s appeal and allowed the cross-objection.

It directed the insurer and the vehicle owner, jointly and severally, to pay Rs. 19,23,480 as enhanced compensation, with interest at 8% per annum from the date of the claim petition until realization, within 12 weeks; it also directed payment of court fee on the enhanced amount and transfer of the statutory deposit with interest to the Tribunal

Source reference: paras. 8–10, pp. 4–6
Bombay High Court

Original Court PDF

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited Through Its Mumbai Corporate OfficevsSmt. Padama Brajesh Kumar Tripathi (Widow Of The Deceased) And Ors.

Bombay High Court · October 14, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment