Chhattisgarh High Court

Enhancement of personal injury compensation based on actual treatment requirements, loss of income, and amenities.

NIRANJAN DHRUW vs LAXMI PRASAD JAISWAL

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 28, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The appellant, Niranjan Dhruw, filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensation for injuries sustained in a motor accident

Source reference: para. 1

The appellant suffered serious leg injuries requiring the surgical insertion of a plate

Source reference: para. 2

The 7th Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Bilaspur, awarded a total compensation of ₹1,43,873/- via an award dated 24/01/2020

Source reference: para. 1, 6

The appellant contended that the award was inadequate given the severity of the injury and treatment undergone

Source reference: para. 2
02

Issues

1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal was just and proper or required enhancement based on the nature of injuries and prevailing wage notifications

Source reference: para. 2, 5
03

Law Applied

Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, regarding appeals against awards

Source reference: para. 1

The assessment of compensation was governed by the principle of "just compensation," specifically considering "loss of income" based on minimum wage notifications prevailing at the time of the accident, as well as non-pecuniary heads such as "pain and suffering," "loss of amenities," and "future treatment"

Source reference: para. 5
04

Reasoning

The High Court observed that the Tribunal erred by not formally assessing the appellant’s monthly income, instead granting a lump sum of ₹50,000/- for loss of income

Source reference: para. 5

Upon reviewing the minimum wage notifications, the Court determined that ₹80,000/- was the appropriate amount for income loss

Source reference: para. 5-6

The Court further analyzed the medical gravity of the injury—specifically the surgical insertion of a plate—concluding that the Tribunal’s grants for future treatment, pain and suffering, special diet, and transportation were insufficient

Source reference: para. 5

Additionally, the Court noted the total omission of compensation for "loss of amenities," which is a standard head in injury claims

Source reference: para. 6

Consequently, the Court re-calculated the heads to reflect a more equitable distribution of damages

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The Court answered the issue in the affirmative, holding that the original compensation was inadequate.

It enhanced the total award from ₹1,43,873/- to ₹2,81,873/-, granting an additional sum of ₹1,38,000/-

Source reference: para. 6-7

Respondent No. 3 (Insurance Company) was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within 30 days, carrying interest @ 8% per annum from the date of the claim application (24/01/2020) until realization

Source reference: para. 7

The appeal was allowed, and the impugned award was modified accordingly

Source reference: para. 8
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

NIRANJAN DHRUWvsLAXMI PRASAD JAISWAL

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment