Facts
The appellant/claimant filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Bhatapara, in Claim Case No. 84/2018.
Source reference: para 1The appellant had suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident involving a Hywa Truck (No. C.G.04 L.E. 9705).
Source reference: para 1The Tribunal originally awarded a total compensation of Rs. 2,82,883/-.
Source reference: para 1The appellant challenged this amount, contending that the Tribunal incorrectly assessed his monthly income at Rs. 6,000/-, failed to include future prospects, and applied an incorrect multiplier.
Source reference: para 2Issues
1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal was just and proper or required enhancement based on the minimum wage notifications and established principles for future prospects.
Source reference: para 2 & 5Law Applied
The Court applied the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, specifically Section 173 regarding appeals.
Source reference: para 1It relied on the Minimum Wages Notification prevailing at the time of the accident to determine income.
Source reference: para 5The Court applied established judicial principles regarding the addition of "future prospects" (calculating a 10% increase for the injured) and the selection of the appropriate multiplier (11) based on the age of the claimant.
Source reference: para 5Reasoning
The Court found that the Claims Tribunal erred in its assessment of the appellant's monthly income. While the Tribunal recorded income at Rs. 6,000/-, the Court determined that as per the minimum wage notification, it should have been Rs. 8,140/-.
Source reference: para 5The Court calculated the loss of income by adding 10% for future prospects to the annual income (Rs. 97,680 + 10%), then calculating the 20% permanent disability of that sum, and finally applying a multiplier of 11, totaling Rs. 2,36,385/- for loss of income.
Source reference: para 6Additionally, the Court found the awards under non-pecuniary heads such as "Pain and Suffering," "Diet," and "Loss of Amenities" to be insufficient, and noted that the Tribunal failed to award any amounts for "Attendant" and "Transportation" costs.
Source reference: para 6Holding
The Court allowed the appeal and enhanced the compensation from Rs. 2,82,883/- to a total of Rs. 5,75,628/-. The appellant is entitled to an additional compensation of Rs. 2,92,385/-.
Respondent No. 3 (Insurance Company) is directed to deposit the enhanced amount within three months with interest at 9% per annum from the date of the claim application (26/03/2018) until realization. All other conditions of the original award remain intact.
Source reference: para 7Original Court PDF
BHAGIRAM KURREvsDHARMENDRA DHRUV
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in