Facts
The petitioner was adjusted into government service as a Research Assistant (Class III) with a Grade Pay of Rs. 4,200/- following the state takeover of the Bihar Research Society on 02.03.2009
Source reference: p. 2He claimed to have discharged duties on a higher Class II post from 09.07.2017 until he was granted an ad-hoc promotion/working arrangement as Assistant Curator on 01.11.2023
Source reference: p. 3While the state contended that his regular promotion was pending due to a general ban by the General Administration Department, the petitioner sought a mandamus for the payment of salary in the higher pay scale (Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/-) and arrears for the period he worked on the higher post
Source reference: p. 1-2Issues
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to the pay scale of Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/- (Pay Level-9) applicable to Class II posts while working under an ad-hoc arrangement.
Source reference: p. 2 / para. 32. Whether the petitioner is entitled to the difference in salary and allowances for the period (09.07.2017 to 31.10.2023) during which he allegedly performed duties of a higher post without formal promotion.
Source reference: p. 2 / para. 3Law Applied
The court primarily relied on the Bihar Finance Department Resolution/Letter No. 7020 dated 24.12.2005 (referenced as 28.12.2005 in parts of the judgment), which governs the financial entitlements of employees officiating on higher posts or under working arrangements.
Source reference: p. 4 / para. 5-6The rule stipulates that an employee discharging duties of a higher post under such arrangements is entitled to an additional 20% of their basic salary, subject to a maximum cap (specified as Rs. 250/- in this context), rather than the full pay scale of the higher post until regularized by a Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC)
Source reference: p. 4 / para. 5-6Reasoning
The court examined the State’s contention that the petitioner’s promotion was not regularized but was a "temporary Ad-hoc charge" under a notification dated 01.11.2023
Source reference: p. 3The court noted that while the petitioner claimed the full Pay Level-9 scale, the Finance Department’s guidelines restrict retrospective financial benefits for officiating roles to a percentage of the basic salary
Source reference: p. 4Since the State did not deny that the petitioner had indeed discharged duties of a higher post since 2017, the court reasoned that a final decision regarding these specific officiating allowances was mandatory
Source reference: p. 4-5Directing the full pay scale (Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/-) at this stage was deemed premature, as that determination rests with the DPC during regular promotion considerations
Source reference: p. 5Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the Principal Secretary, Art, Culture and Youth Department, Government of Bihar, to consider the petitioner’s claim specifically regarding the 20% basic salary benefit for the period he served on the higher post
This decision must be taken within eight weeks. The prayer for the regular pay scale of Rs. 5,400/- was deferred to be considered by the Departmental Promotion Committee at the time of regularizing the petitioner’s promotion
Source reference: para. 7Original Court PDF
Dr. Shiva Kumar MishravsThe State of Bihar
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in