Patna High Court

Entitlement to Additional Pay for Discharging Duties of a Higher Post under Ad Hoc Working Arrangement

Dr. Shiva Kumar Mishra vs The State of Bihar

Patna High CourtJUDGMENT: June 25, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner was adjusted into government service as a Research Assistant (Class III) with a Grade Pay of Rs. 4,200/- following the state takeover of the Bihar Research Society on 02.03.2009

Source reference: p. 2

He claimed to have discharged duties on a higher Class II post from 09.07.2017 until he was granted an ad-hoc promotion/working arrangement as Assistant Curator on 01.11.2023

Source reference: p. 3

While the state contended that his regular promotion was pending due to a general ban by the General Administration Department, the petitioner sought a mandamus for the payment of salary in the higher pay scale (Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/-) and arrears for the period he worked on the higher post

Source reference: p. 1-2
02

Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to the pay scale of Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/- (Pay Level-9) applicable to Class II posts while working under an ad-hoc arrangement.

Source reference: p. 2 / para. 3

2. Whether the petitioner is entitled to the difference in salary and allowances for the period (09.07.2017 to 31.10.2023) during which he allegedly performed duties of a higher post without formal promotion.

Source reference: p. 2 / para. 3
03

Law Applied

The court primarily relied on the Bihar Finance Department Resolution/Letter No. 7020 dated 24.12.2005 (referenced as 28.12.2005 in parts of the judgment), which governs the financial entitlements of employees officiating on higher posts or under working arrangements.

Source reference: p. 4 / para. 5-6

The rule stipulates that an employee discharging duties of a higher post under such arrangements is entitled to an additional 20% of their basic salary, subject to a maximum cap (specified as Rs. 250/- in this context), rather than the full pay scale of the higher post until regularized by a Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC)

Source reference: p. 4 / para. 5-6
04

Reasoning

The court examined the State’s contention that the petitioner’s promotion was not regularized but was a "temporary Ad-hoc charge" under a notification dated 01.11.2023

Source reference: p. 3

The court noted that while the petitioner claimed the full Pay Level-9 scale, the Finance Department’s guidelines restrict retrospective financial benefits for officiating roles to a percentage of the basic salary

Source reference: p. 4

Since the State did not deny that the petitioner had indeed discharged duties of a higher post since 2017, the court reasoned that a final decision regarding these specific officiating allowances was mandatory

Source reference: p. 4-5

Directing the full pay scale (Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/-) at this stage was deemed premature, as that determination rests with the DPC during regular promotion considerations

Source reference: p. 5
05

Holding

The Court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the Principal Secretary, Art, Culture and Youth Department, Government of Bihar, to consider the petitioner’s claim specifically regarding the 20% basic salary benefit for the period he served on the higher post

This decision must be taken within eight weeks. The prayer for the regular pay scale of Rs. 5,400/- was deferred to be considered by the Departmental Promotion Committee at the time of regularizing the petitioner’s promotion

Source reference: para. 7
Patna High Court

Original Court PDF

Dr. Shiva Kumar MishravsThe State of Bihar

Patna High Court · June 25, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment