Facts
The petitioner was adjusted into government service as a Research Assistant (Class III) with a Grade Pay of Rs. 4,200/- following the state takeover of the Bihar Research Society on 02.03.2009
Source reference: p. 2He claimed to have discharged duties on a higher Class II post from 09.07.2017 until he was granted an ad-hoc promotion/working arrangement as Assistant Curator on 01.11.2023
Source reference: p. 3While the state contended that his regular promotion was pending due to a general ban by the General Administration Department, the petitioner sought a mandamus for the payment of salary in the higher pay scale (Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/-) and arrears for the period he worked on the higher post
Source reference: p. 1-2Issues
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to the pay scale of Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/- (Pay Level-9) applicable to Class II posts while working under an ad-hoc arrangement.
Source reference: p. 2 / para. 32. Whether the petitioner is entitled to the difference in salary and allowances for the period (09.07.2017 to 31.10.2023) during which he allegedly performed duties of a higher post without formal promotion.
Source reference: p. 2 / para. 3Law Applied
The court primarily relied on the Bihar Finance Department Resolution/Letter No. 7020 dated 24.12.2005 (referenced as 28.12.2005 in parts of the judgment), which governs the financial entitlements of employees officiating on higher posts or under working arrangements.
Source reference: p. 4 / para. 5-6The rule stipulates that an employee discharging duties of a higher post under such arrangements is entitled to an additional 20% of their basic salary, subject to a maximum cap (specified as Rs. 250/- in this context), rather than the full pay scale of the higher post until regularized by a Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC)
Source reference: p. 4 / para. 5-6Reasoning
The court examined the State’s contention that the petitioner’s promotion was not regularized but was a "temporary Ad-hoc charge" under a notification dated 01.11.2023
Source reference: p. 3The court noted that while the petitioner claimed the full Pay Level-9 scale, the Finance Department’s guidelines restrict retrospective financial benefits for officiating roles to a percentage of the basic salary
Source reference: p. 4Since the State did not deny that the petitioner had indeed discharged duties of a higher post since 2017, the court reasoned that a final decision regarding these specific officiating allowances was mandatory
Source reference: p. 4-5Directing the full pay scale (Grade Pay Rs. 5,400/-) at this stage was deemed premature, as that determination rests with the DPC during regular promotion considerations
Source reference: p. 5Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the Principal Secretary, Art, Culture and Youth Department, Government of Bihar, to consider the petitioner’s claim specifically regarding the 20% basic salary benefit for the period he served on the higher post
This decision must be taken within eight weeks. The prayer for the regular pay scale of Rs. 5,400/- was deferred to be considered by the Departmental Promotion Committee at the time of regularizing the petitioner’s promotion
Source reference: para. 7Acts & Sections Cited
2 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Linked provisions open on LawLens.
Finance Department Resolution/Letter No. 7020 dated 24.12.2005 (Government of Bihar)1
General Administration Department Notification No. 19300 dated 13.10.2023 (Government of Bihar)1
Original Court PDF
Dr. Shiva Kumar MishravsThe State of Bihar
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
