Chhattisgarh High Court

Entitlement to regular bail on grounds of parity with co-accused granted bail by a higher court.

BOBBY KHATRI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: May 06, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Bobby Khatri, was arrested in connection with Crime No. 129/2025 involving alleged organized cyber fraud.

Source reference: para. 1, 2

Investigations revealed 128 "mule accounts" in Bank of Maharashtra, Raipur, used to receive defrauded money totaling ₹64,10,855/-.

Source reference: para. 2, 4

The applicant’s first bail application (MCRC No. 10106/2025) was rejected on merits on 09.12.2025.

Source reference: para. 3

This second bail application was filed following the grant of bail to several co-accused persons by the Supreme Court and the High Court.

Source reference: para. 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) on the ground of parity with co-accused persons who were granted bail after the rejection of the applicant's first bail application.

Source reference: para. 3, 6
03

Law Applied

The court applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the grant of regular bail.

Source reference: para. 1

It relied heavily on the principle of judicial parity, noting that the Hon’ble Supreme Court granted bail to co-accused Ishika Singh in Criminal Appeal No. 4494/2025.

Source reference: para. 3, 4, 6

The court also considered Sections 111 (Organized Crime), 3(5) (Common Intention), and 317 (Stolen Property) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

Source reference: para. 1, 7
04

Reasoning

The Court noted that while the applicant's prior bail plea was rejected on merits, the circumstances had changed as the charge-sheet was now filed and multiple co-accused had since been released.

Source reference: para. 6

Specifically, the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s decision to grant bail to co-accused Ishika Singh created a ground for parity.

Source reference: para. 6

Despite the State’s opposition regarding the applicant's involvement in diverting ₹64,10,855/-, the prosecution could not dispute that similarly situated co-accused, including Avinash Tandekar and Jayant Ghosh, had been granted relief by the High Court in early 2026.

Source reference: para. 4, 6

Consequently, the Court found it equitable to extend the same benefit to the applicant.

Source reference: para. 6
05

Holding

The Court answered the issue in the affirmative and granted regular bail to the applicant on the ground of parity.

The applicant was ordered to be released upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including: attending all court dates, not seeking unnecessary adjournments, and appearing for charge framing/statements under Section 351 BNSS.

Source reference: para. 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

BOBBY KHATRIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · May 06, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment