Facts
The applicant, Bobby Khatri, was arrested in connection with Crime No. 129/2025 involving alleged organized cyber fraud.
Source reference: para. 1, 2Investigations revealed 128 "mule accounts" in Bank of Maharashtra, Raipur, used to receive defrauded money totaling ₹64,10,855/-.
Source reference: para. 2, 4The applicant’s first bail application (MCRC No. 10106/2025) was rejected on merits on 09.12.2025.
Source reference: para. 3This second bail application was filed following the grant of bail to several co-accused persons by the Supreme Court and the High Court.
Source reference: para. 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) on the ground of parity with co-accused persons who were granted bail after the rejection of the applicant's first bail application.
Source reference: para. 3, 6Law Applied
The court applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the grant of regular bail.
Source reference: para. 1It relied heavily on the principle of judicial parity, noting that the Hon’ble Supreme Court granted bail to co-accused Ishika Singh in Criminal Appeal No. 4494/2025.
Source reference: para. 3, 4, 6The court also considered Sections 111 (Organized Crime), 3(5) (Common Intention), and 317 (Stolen Property) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
Source reference: para. 1, 7Reasoning
The Court noted that while the applicant's prior bail plea was rejected on merits, the circumstances had changed as the charge-sheet was now filed and multiple co-accused had since been released.
Source reference: para. 6Specifically, the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s decision to grant bail to co-accused Ishika Singh created a ground for parity.
Source reference: para. 6Despite the State’s opposition regarding the applicant's involvement in diverting ₹64,10,855/-, the prosecution could not dispute that similarly situated co-accused, including Avinash Tandekar and Jayant Ghosh, had been granted relief by the High Court in early 2026.
Source reference: para. 4, 6Consequently, the Court found it equitable to extend the same benefit to the applicant.
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The Court answered the issue in the affirmative and granted regular bail to the applicant on the ground of parity.
The applicant was ordered to be released upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including: attending all court dates, not seeking unnecessary adjournments, and appearing for charge framing/statements under Section 351 BNSS.
Source reference: para. 7Acts & Sections Cited
8 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20233
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20235
Original Court PDF
BOBBY KHATRIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
