Facts
The Petitioner, an advocate and former law student, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the establishment of a Bone Bank at Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai.
Source reference: p.2-3The petitioner argued that although the Union Government passed the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994, leading to a Bone Bank in Chennai in 2005, Madurai lacked such a facility to assist patients requiring harvested bones (e.g., femur, tibia) for cancer treatment or joint replacements.
Source reference: p.4During the pendency of the writ, the State established the facility.
Source reference: p.4Issues
1. Whether the respondents should be directed to establish a Bone Bank and an associated Advisory Board at Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai, to facilitate orthopedic surgeries and organ donation.
Source reference: p.22. Whether the court should direct the conduct of awareness programs regarding the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994, to sensitize the general public.
Source reference: p.3Law Applied
The court's reasoning was based on the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994, which governs the removal, storage, and transplantation of human organs and tissues for therapeutic purposes.
Source reference: p.4The Court exercised its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to oversee the implementation of public health infrastructure and ensure the statutory objectives of the 1994 Act were met in the interest of the general public.
Source reference: p.2, 5Reasoning
The Court observed that the Writ Petition, though pending for six years, achieved its primary objective as the 7th Respondent (Dean, Government Rajaji Hospital) filed a status report confirming the establishment of the Bone Bank.
Source reference: p.4The facility was licensed on 16.12.2021 (Registration No. 460/2021) under the 1994 Act and had already benefited 197 patients by the time of the hearing.
Source reference: p.4-5The Court noted that while the infrastructure was now functional, there remained a significant need for public sensitization to maximize the utility of the bank and encourage donations.
Source reference: p.5Consequently, the Court determined that further mandatory directions for establishment were unnecessary, but educational outreach was essential.
Source reference: p.6Holding
The Court disposed of the Writ Petition, noting that the Bone Bank in Madurai is fully operational and has actively served beneficiaries since 2022.
The Court placed a formal request to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority and the District Legal Services Authority to examine possibilities for sensitizing the public about the advantages of Bone Banks and the salient features of the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994.
Source reference: p.6No costs were ordered.
Source reference: p.6Original Court PDF
M.Vetri SelvanvsUnion of India,
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in