Delhi High Court

Ex-servicemen retain reservation benefits for multiple pre-joining applications despite intervening civil employment under O.M. dated 14.08.2014.

Union Of India And Ors vs Dharmendra Kumar Vidyarthi And Ors

Delhi High CourtJUDGMENT: May 18, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Respondent No. 4, an ex-serviceman, applied for the Combined Graduate Level Examination (CGLE), 2013, while still in defense service

Source reference: para 3-4

He was discharged on 31.01.2013

Source reference: para 4

On 10.04.2013, he joined the State Bank of India (SBI) as a Customer Assistant by availing the ex-serviceman reservation

Source reference: para 9

Due to exam irregularities, the CGLE 2013 process was re-conducted in 2014 and 2015

Source reference: para 5-6

Respondent No. 4 was eventually selected for the post of Auditor under the ex-serviceman quota in March 2015

Source reference: para 7

However, the Petitioners (Union of India) canceled his dossier, arguing that under O.M. dated 02.05.1985 and 07.11.1989, his ex-serviceman status for 4subsequent employment ceased once he joined SBI

Source reference: para 11-12

The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) ruled in favor of the Respondent, prompting this writ petition

Source reference: para 1, 15
02

Issues

1. Whether Respondent No. 4 was entitled to the benefit of the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) Office Memorandum (O.M.) dated 14.08.2014 regarding the retention of ex-serviceman status for multiple career applications.

Source reference: para 21
03

Law Applied

The Court applied the DoPT Office Memoranda (O.M.) of 02.05.1985 and 07.11.1989, which generally state that ex-serviceman status for reservation ceases upon joining civil employment

Source reference: para 11, 23

however, this is qualified by O.M. dated 14.08.2014, which carves out an exception: if an ex-serviceman applies for multiple vacancies before joining any civil employment, they may still avail reservation for those specific subsequent recruitments

Source reference: para 22, 28

Furthermore, the Court relied on the principle of liberal and purposive construction of beneficial and remedial provisions to advance the legislative/administrative object, citing Union of India v. Mukul Dev and Brahampal v. National Insurance Co.

Source reference: para 35, footnote 8
04

Reasoning

The Court observed that O.M. dated 14.08.2014 was specifically issued to "cure the mischief" and hardships caused by the older 1985/1989 O.M.s, which penalized ex-servicemen for joining a post while other applications were pending

Source reference: para 27-28

It was undisputed that Respondent No. 4 applied for CGLE 2013 while still holding ex-serviceman status and before joining SBI

Source reference: para 30, 36

Although he joined SBI in 2013, the CGLE selection process culminated in 2015, after the 14.08.2014 O.M. had come into force

Source reference: para 31, 37

The Court rejected the Petitioners' technical objection regarding the lack of a self-declaration/undertaking, noting that this plea was never raised before the Tribunal and could not be introduced at the writ stage

Source reference: para 41-43

Applying a purposive interpretation, the Court held that since the Respondent fulfilled the essential condition of applying for the post before joining civil service, he remained entitled to the reservation

Source reference: para 38-39
05

Holding

The Court answered the issue in the affirmative, holding that Respondent No. 4 is entitled to the benefit of para 4 of the DoPT O.M. dated 14.08.2014

The High Court dismissed the writ petition in limine and upheld the Tribunal’s order directed the Petitioners to comply by appointing Respondent No. 4 within four weeks

Source reference: para 45-46
Delhi High Court

Original Court PDF

Union Of India And OrsvsDharmendra Kumar Vidyarthi And Ors

Delhi High Court · May 18, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment