Rajasthan High Court

### Excise policy transition to cluster-based renewal subject to district-wide thresholds is constitutionally valid and non-arbitrary.

Jamana W/o Jetha Ram v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [2026:RJ-JD:9742-DB]

Rajasthan High CourtJUDGMENT: no citation1 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioners, existing licensees of retail liquor shops in Rajasthan, challenged the constitutional validity of Clauses 2.2.6, 2.2.7, and 2.2.8 of the Rajasthan Excise & Temperance Policy 2025–2029.

Source reference: para 1.1, 3.6

The Policy introduced a "cluster" system (1–5 shops) and mandated that renewal of individual licenses in a district was conditional upon (i) 70% of eligible licensees in that district applying for renewal, and (ii) all shops within a specific cluster opting for renewal.

Source reference: para 3.1, 3.3

The petitioner’s renewal application was cancelled because one shop in her assigned cluster remained unrenewed, leading the Department to propose a cluster-wise auction.

Source reference: para 3.5
Rajasthan High Court

Original Court PDF

Jamana W/o Jetha Ram v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [2026:RJ-JD:9742-DB]

Rajasthan High Court · no citation

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment