Karnataka High Court
Civil LawInsurance Law

Functional disability must account for spinal and lower-limb injuries when assessing future income loss.

GIRIJA vs AADIL PASHA

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 25, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Functional disability must account for spinal and lower-limb injuries when assessing future income loss.. GIRIJA vs AADIL PASHA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

Girija appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the V Additional District Judge and Additional MACT, Hassan, for injuries sustained in a road accident on 20 July 2021 involving a goods vehicle

Source reference: p. 2–3

The Tribunal awarded total compensation of ₹5,97,144, including ₹2,79,000 for future loss of income, and directed the insurer to pay interest at 6% per annum

Source reference: p. 3–4

The claimant challenged the adequacy of the award.

Source reference: p. 3–4

The High Court heard the appeal with the consent of counsel for the claimant and insurer

Source reference: p. 3
02

Issues

Whether the compensation awarded for the claimant’s injuries and their consequences required enhancement

Source reference: p. 5–7

Whether the claimant’s functional disability should be assessed at 15% for calculating future loss of income

Source reference: p. 6
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for an appeal against an award of the Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: p. 2

future loss of income is calculated by applying the appropriate monthly income, multiplier and functional disability; and compensation under other heads should reflect the injuries and their effects

Source reference: p. 5–7
04

Reasoning

The Court accepted the Tribunal’s use of a multiplier of 15 and notional monthly income of ₹15,000, but, considering the doctor’s evidence of disability to the lower limb and spine, assessed functional disability at 15% rather than the Tribunal’s whole-body disability assessment of 10.33%.

Source reference: p. 4, 6

It therefore calculated future loss of income at ₹4,05,000 (₹15,000 × 12 × 15 × 15%).

Source reference: p. 6

Given the injuries and the need for at least six months’ rest, it enhanced compensation for pain and suffering, loss of amenities and laid-up-period income, while retaining the Tribunal’s amounts under the remaining heads.

Source reference: p. 5–7
05

Holding

The Court partly allowed the appeal and increased total compensation from ₹5,97,144 to ₹9,27,144, granting enhanced compensation of ₹3,30,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.

It directed the insurer to deposit the enhanced amount with interest before the Tribunal within six weeks; the claimant was entitled to release of the entire enhanced compensation.

Source reference: p. 8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

GIRIJAvsAADIL PASHA

Karnataka High Court · September 25, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment