Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Future prospects must be added when calculating loss of future income for permanent disability exceeding 20%.

SRI SHIVARAJU P vs SRI MUNIRAJU K.,

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 08, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Future prospects must be added when calculating loss of future income for permanent disability exceeding 20%.. SRI SHIVARAJU P vs SRI MUNIRAJU K.,. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimant sustained injuries in a road traffic accident on 1 January 2019.

Source reference: p. 3

The Tribunal awarded him ₹6,75,428, including compensation for permanent disability assessed by reference to a monthly income of ₹14,000 and multiplier of 17.

Source reference: pp. 3–4

Seeking enhancement, the claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act.

Source reference: p. 2

The High Court considered the injuries, medical evidence and claimed disability.

Source reference: pp. 2, 4–7
02

Issues

1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal required enhancement, particularly in light of the claimant’s injuries and functional disability.

Source reference: pp. 6–8

2. Whether the claimant was entitled to interest on the enhanced compensation for the appeal’s delayed filing period.

Source reference: p. 9
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act.

Source reference: p. 2

In assessing compensation for loss of future income, the Court applied a multiplier of 17, based on the claimant’s age of 29, and used a monthly income of ₹14,000.

Source reference: p. 4

It assessed functional disability at 25% and added 40% for future prospects, given that the disability exceeded 20%.

Source reference: pp. 6–7

The judgment cites no specific precedent.

Source reference: no citation
04

Reasoning

The Court found the Tribunal’s multiplier and income assessment appropriate but concluded that the medical evidence—including loss of vision in the left eye and facial fractures—supported functional disability of 25%.

Source reference: pp. 4–7

Applying the multiplier method and adding 40% future prospects, it recalculated loss of future income at ₹9,99,600.

Source reference: p. 7

It also enhanced compensation for pain and suffering, loss of amenities and the two-month laid-up period, while affirming the amounts for medical expenses and incidental expenses.

Source reference: pp. 7–8

The Court excluded interest for the 473-day delay in filing the appeal, in accordance with its order on the delay application.

Source reference: p. 9
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

The Court increased total compensation to ₹13,04,948, an enhancement of ₹6,29,520, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realisation, excluding the 473-day delay period.

Source reference: pp. 8–9

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation and interest within six weeks, and the claimant was permitted to withdraw the entire enhanced amount.

Source reference: p. 9
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI SHIVARAJU PvsSRI MUNIRAJU K.,

Karnataka High Court · October 08, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment